IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Alok Kumar Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Guard Lko. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the selection process and advertisement details. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners argue against the new stringent conditions for the physical test. (Para 4) |
| 3. respondent argues the conditions were part of the original advertisement. (Para 5) |
| 4. court analyzes the legality of the impugned notification. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court dismisses the petition, finding no merit. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT :
Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Utsav Mishra, learned counsel for U.P. Subordinate Service Selection Commission, respondent No.2.
2. The petitioners have prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing impugned notification dated5.3.2025 (Annexure No.1).
A further prayer for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to complete selection process by simplifying physical test in accordance with the original advertisement No.23 Pariksha-2016 ignoring the notification dated 5.3.2025 (supra) which has been issued after completion of written test and document verification, has also been made.
3.The facts of the case, in brief, are that in the year 2016, Advertisement No.23 Examination/2016 was


Ramesh Chandra Shah and others versus Anil Joshi and others
Dhananjay Malik and others versus State of Uttaranchal and others
The court upheld the validity of a notification imposing physical test conditions, affirming that they were in accordance with the original recruitment advertisement and rules, not altering the selec....
Ex-servicemen undergoing recruitment must be assessed under specific rules outlining moderate fitness standards, rather than rigorous standards applied to younger recruits.
Point of Law : Selecting body does not have its right to alter the procedure for selection than what is prescribed under the relevant Service Rules, 2014 and Recruitment Rules, 2017.
The authority of the Commission to modulate the method of recruitment within the powers granted by the Act and Rules.
The court reaffirmed that candidates participating in a selection process cannot challenge the established criteria post-participation, emphasizing adherence to statutory rules and the irrelevance of....
Post of Police constable – Direct recruitment - To lower respective category-wise merit and accord selection to them on the vacant posts of Constable (Civil Police/PAC) – Held, Such situation eventua....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.