SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Raj) 61

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
SAMEER JAIN
Sristi Singhal D/o Satyendra Singhal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Tanveer Ahamed with, Mr. Mohit Sharma, Mr. Bhawani S. Saini with, Mr. Shivam Awasthi, Mr. Lokesh Saini, Mr. Tanay Jain with, Mr. Sachin Sharma, Mr. Prakhar Sharma, Mr. Brahma Nand Sandu, Mr. Parth Sarthi Sandu, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Sandu, Mr. Anshuman Saxena, Mr. Divyansh Saini, Mr. Pradeep Mathur, Mr. Mohit Khandelwal with, Mr. Pranav Sharma, Mr. Keshav Dadhich, Mr. Harendar Neel, Mr. Amogh Gupta, Mr. Rohan Gupta, Mr. Naman Yadav, Mr. Amit Kumar, Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with, Mr. Aamir Khan, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore, Mr. Ishan Verma
For the Respondent: Mr. M.F. Baig with, Mr. Govind Gupta, Mr. Ashutosh Gupta (IAS), Chief Controller Exam, RPSC present in person, Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with, Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma &, Ms. Epsa Nangalia, Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi, Dy. G.C.

Table of Content
1. overview of challenging recruitment process (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioners argue against evaluation process (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. citing precedents for legal argument (Para 11)
4. respondents defend evaluation process (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. court's extensive analysis and conclusions (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
6. court dismisses petitions (Para 32 , 33 , 34)

JUDGMENT :

Sameer Jain, J.

1. In the present batch of writ petitions, the scope of the controversy involved, albeit not limited to but is broadly and predominantly defined by the challenge raised regarding the arbitrariness inflicted upon the petitioners in checking the copies of Mains examination for recruitment on the post of Assistant Prosecution Officer in pursuance of advertisement dated 07.03.2024. Consequently, considering the fact that the writ petitions warrant adjudication on common questions of law and fact; with the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the parties, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19981/2025 titled as Srishti Singhal and Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors, is being taken up as the lead case. It is cautiously

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top