SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2712

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, BENCH AT JAIPUR
RAVI CHIRANIA, J.
Megha Kanwar, Wife of Shri Surendra Singh Chawra – Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary Department of Finance – Respondent 
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13746 of 2025
Decided On : 03-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed
For the Respondent: Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi Mr. Kumarpal Gautam, Secretary Finance (Revenue).

Non-discrimination in employment for employees with disabilities is mandated under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, requiring timely salary payments and reimbursements for medical expenses.

Headnote:(A) Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Section 20(4) - Non-payment of salary and reimbursement of medical bills - Employee in coma for over two years, with reported 76% disability - Court emphasized the obligation of the government to provide reasonable accommodation and ensure non-discrimination in employment as per the Act - It was urged that department unlawfully withheld salary despite awareness of medical condition - Court referred to prior judgments establishing the right to salary and benefits for disabled employees. (Paras 5, 8, 11, 12, 13)

(B) Article 21 of Constitution of India - Right to live with dignity - The court underscored that not disbursing salary and medical reimbursements for an employee with severe medical conditions violates their fundamental rights. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The husband of the petitioner, a Commercial Taxes Officer, has been in a coma since 2023 due to a brain hemorrhage, and the respondents have failed to pay his salary or reimburse medical expenses without justification.

Findings of Court:
The respondents must resolve the grievance of the petitioner and ensure timely payment of salary and reimbursements as mandated by law within seven days.

Issues: Whether the failure to pay salary and reimburse medical bills constitutes discrimination and a violation of the rights of a disabled employee as established under the Act of 2016.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 are designed to protect employees who acquire disabilities during their service, and failure to comply is inhumane and unreasonable.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions to pay due salary and reimburse medical expenses.

Table of Content
1. employee's disability requires salary payment. (Para 2)
2. court's directive for urgent response noted. (Para 3 , 4 , 9 , 10)
3. rights under the act of 2016 prevent salary withholding. (Para 5 , 11 , 12)
4. violation of employee rights affirmed. (Para 7 , 8)
5. court directs timely payment resolution. (Para 13)

Order :

RAVI CHIRANIA, J.

1. The Court issued notices to the respondents on 23.09.2025 and Additional Advocate General was directed to file reply in the matter.

2. Looking to the facts of the case that the husband of the petitioner, a Commercial Taxes Officer, suffered a Brain Hemorrhage in the year 2023 and thereafter, he is under treatment and in coma from the last more than two years and the respondents are not paying salary to her husband and also not reimbursing the medical bills without any justified reason, this matter was taken up today as an urgent case.

3. Looking to the serious medical condition of the husband of the petitioner, this Court instructed Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, Assistant Government Counsel to ensure the presence of respondent No.2 before this Court physically or through VC mode. In view of the above noted circumstances, keeping into consideration the various directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court regarding calling the senior officials in the Court matter physically or through VC, this Court called the concerned official looking to the gravity of the matter as noted above.

4. Mr. Kumarpal Gautam, Finance Secretary, Revenue, having additional charge of Commissioner, Department of Commercial Taxes, appeared through VC before this Court and submitted that he is not aware of the complete facts of the case however, the concerned employee has consumed all his medical and other leaves, therefore, as informed to him by his subordinates, payment of salary might not have been made. He assured this Court that he would look into the matter and would try to resolve the issue at the earliest at his end.

5. Before issuing any directions in this regard to the respondents, it would be apt to discuss the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (for short ‘the Act of 2016’) as applicable to the facts of the present case. Relevant section 20 of the Act of 2016 is reproduced as under:

20. Non-discrimination in employment.—(1) No Government establishment shall discriminate against any person with disability in any matter relating to employment:

Provided that the appropriate Government may, having regard to the type of work carried on in any establishment, by notification and subject to such conditions, if any, exempt any establishment from the provisions of this section.

(2) Every Government establishment shall provide reasonable accommodation and appropriate barrier free and conducive environment to employees with disability.

(3) No promotion shall be denied to a person merely on the ground of disability.

(4) No Government establishment shall dispense with or reduce in rank, an employee who acquires a disability during his or her service:

Provided that, if an employee after acquiring disability is not suitable for the post he was holding, shall be shifted to some other post with the same pay scale and service benefits:

Provided further that if it is not possible to adjust the employee against any post, he may be kept on a supernumerary post until a suitable post is available or he attains the age of superannuation, whichever is earlier.

(5) The appropriate Government may frame policies for posting and transfer of employees with disabilities.

Section 20 (4) of the Act of 2016 mandates that no government establishment shall dispense with or reduce in rank any employee who acquires a disability during his or her service. The facts of the present case, as noted from the pleadings in the writ petition, shows that petitioner was last performing his duties as Commercial Taxes Officer without any medical problem however, he suffered Brain Hemorrhage in the year 2023 and on account of which he is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top