SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 673

SATYEN VAIDYA
Raj Sharma S/o Late Shri Sita Ram Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P.P. Chauhan.
For the Respondents: Narender Thakur, Vikrant Thakur.

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

SATYEN VAIDYA, J.

Heard.

1. Both these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment as identical questions of facts and law are involved.

2. Undisputed facts of the case are that respondent No. 2 held selection process for Himachal Pradesh Administrative Services through Himachal Pradesh Administrative Services etc. combined competitive examination. The advertisement was issued in December, 2000. Four posts of H.P. Administrative Services were advertised besides other posts in Allied categories. One out of the four posts of H.P. Administrative Services was reserved for Ex-servicemen (General) category.

3. On completion of selection process the merit list was drawn. One Shri Giri Raj Sharma was placed on top of the merit list under Ex-servicemen category. Respondent No. 2 recommended his name for the post of H.P. Administrative Services. On scrutiny of the documents of Shri Giri Raj Sh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top