SATYEN VAIDYA
Prem Chand – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Satyen Vaidya, J.
By way of instant petition, petitioners have prayed for following substantive reliefs:-
ii) That the respondent-Board may be directed to give the seniority to the applicants as Assistant Engineers (Electrical) since 27.04.1992/May 1992, vide A-3 which was followed without break, continuously and uninterruptedly till regularization on 31.12.1997, vide A-4 for all intends and purposes, forthwith.
iii) That the action of the respondent-Board in not holding the DPC for regular promotions since April, 1992 till December, 1997, only to deny the regular promotion and seniority w.e.f. date of initial appointment/promotion on 27.04.1992 vide A-3/May 1992, may be declared illegal and unconstitutional forthwith.
iv) That in the alternative, the respondent-Board may be directed to hold review DPC or to give promotion as Assistant Engineers (Electrical) as per the R&P Rules being a ‘selection post’ by applying the criteria as in the OM, dated ¾.11.1981 vide A-8 and by giving due weightage to the factum of performing arduous and higher nature of du
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.