TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SATYEN VAIDYA
Brij Bala Rana – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
CMP (M) No. 241/2023
For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 57 days in filing of the appeal is ordered to be condoned. The application stands disposed of.
LPA No.114/2023
Be registered.
2. The appellant is the writ petitioner, who, aggrieved by dismissal of her writ petition, has filed the instant appeal.
3. The appellant approached the learned writ court for grant of following substantive relief:-
4. In the writ petition, the appellant arrayed the State authorities as respondents No. 1 to 3, whereas her daughter-in-law as respondent No.4.
5. Learned writ court confronted the appellant with the issue of maintainability of the writ petition in terms of prayer made therein and the appellant in turn relied upon provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (for short, the Act).
6. Learned writ court came to the conclusion that since the Act had not been made applicable to the State of Himachal Pradesh by issuance of necessary notification in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.