Back
RANJAN SHARMA
Ram Prakash Kapil – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Notice. Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal at this stage, in view of the orders, intended to be passed herein.
3. The petitioner has filed the writ petition with the following prayers:-
(ii) That the respondent may kindly be directed to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the direction passed by the Hon’ble Court vide Judgment dated 07.07.2022 in CWP No.842 of 2017, titled as “State of H.P. and Others versus Sardari Lal and Another”.
4. The case of the petitioner is that on promotion as Headmaster, the pay of the petitioner was required to be fixed by giving the admissible increments under Fundamental Rule 22(I)(a)(i), over and above the pay being drawn by him as Lecturer School Cadre.
The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Fundamental Rule 22(1)(a)(1) and the application of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in similar cases.
The court emphasized the right to equal treatment and directed the respondent to consider extending similar benefits to the petitioners if they are found to be similarly situated to the petitioners i....
Entitlement to pay scale under the Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules and the application of previous judgments in determining entitlement to the revised pay scale.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to additional increment upon promotion is determined by the relevant rules and resolutions, and misinterpretation of these rul....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the application and interpretation of Government Order No.25 P & AR Department dated 23.03.2015 to rectify pay anomalies between seniors and ju....
Appointment to higher post with greater duties and responsibilities, evidenced by higher pay scale, entitles government servant to pay fixation under FR 22(I)(a)(1) with one increment, not FR 22(I)(a....
Promotion claims without meeting prescribed qualifications are invalid, and salary fixation in the lower pay scale is upheld when no evidence supports the claimed promotion.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
