Hari Ram vs HRTC Through Managing Director (HRTC)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(HP) 480

RANJAN SHARMA
Hari Ram – Appellant
Versus
HRTC Through Managing Director (HRTC) – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Atul Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Gathania.

JUDGMENT :

Ranjan Sharma, J.

Notice. Mr. Rahul Gathania, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2.

2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the peculiar facts as borne out from the pleadings.

3. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition with the following prayer(s):-

“(i) That the impugned office orders dated 31-10-2023, 06-12-2023 whereby the petitioner has been ordered to be transferred from Sundernagar to Nerwa may very kindly be quashed and set aside and the petitioner may very kindly be allowed to work at the present place of posting keeping in view of Transfer Policy in the interest of justice.”

4. The petitioner is a Sub-Inspector in the Himachal Road Transport Corporation and is posted in HRTC Unit Sundernagar.

5. The petitioner has assailed the Office Order dated 31.10.2023 (Annexure P-1) transferring the petitioner from Sundernagar to Nerwa. The petitioner has assailed the Office Order dated 31.10.2023 (Annexure P-1) on the ground, that firstly as per the existing transfer policy, also issued by State Government, which is applicable for employees of Re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document