Sudhir Kumar vs State of H. P. - 2023 Supreme(HP) 455

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(HP) 455

RANJAN SHARMA
Sudhir Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Surinder K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rohit Thakur,

JUDGMENT :

RANJAN SHARMA, J.

Notice. Mr. Rohit Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner has filed the instant petition with the following prayer(s):-

“i) That writ of certiorari may kindly be issued, quashing and setting aside the impugned office order dated 31.10.2023 (Annexure P-1) qua the petitioner.

ii) That writ of mandamus may kindly be also issued, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue to work at the present place of posting i.e. Government Senior Secondary School Bator, District Chamba, H.P.”

3. In the backdrop of the reliefs as claimed, the only claim of the petitioner based on averments in Para 2 and 4 (B) of the writ petition, is that, the petitioner was appointed as Drawing Master in the respondent-department in December, 2013 and was posted in Government Senior Secondary School Batot, District Chamba, which is a hard/difficult/remote/rural area. His only grievance is that now as per the impugned order dated 31.10.2023, Annexure P-1, he has again been transferred from GSSS Batot, District Chamba to GHS Bihali under complex Government Senior Secondary School Sikothi, Di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document