VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Parmod Bamba – Appellant
Versus
Sudarshana Devi (now deceased) through her legal representative – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vivek Singh Thakur, J.
Instant petition has been preferred by petitioner/tenant against order dated 27.6.2023, passed by Rent Controller Court No. 1, Shimla in Miscellaneous Application No. 1204 of 2021 in Rent Case No. 900241/2014, titled as Sudershana Devi Vs. M/s Super Sanitation and others preferred by respondent No. 1/landlord for eviction of tenant(s) from the commercial premises under the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 (herein after referred as ‘Rent Act’).
2. Respondents No. 2 to 5 herein are also respondents in Rent Petition alongwith petitioner herein. Before Rent Controller, all of them alongwith petitioner herein are being represented by one and the same counsel through whom present petition has been preferred and their interest is common, therefore, notice was not issued to them in present petition.
3. Respondent No. 2 M/s Super Sanitation, a partnership firm, has been sued through partner Parmod Bamba by impleading all known surviving partners, including Parmod Bamba, as respondents in the capacity of partners of M/s Super Sanitation.
4. Parties to the lis, hereinafter, shall be addressed by their status before the Rent Controller, i.e. landlord and tenant(s)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.