IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
Dinesh Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. - Respondents
CWP No. 9635 of 2023
Decided On : 01-12-2023
Transfer Policy - Employee Transfer - The court held that the Transfer Guidelines-Policy issued by the State Government mandated that employees who have already served in tribal/difficult/remote/hard areas have a right to be considered for posting in soft areas, in order to avoid discrimination amongst employees in a cadre, leading to arbitrariness and violation of Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Veterinary Officer, sought transfer to a place of his choice after completing the normal tenure in a hard/difficult/remote/rural area. The State Authorities had not acted on his representations for transfer.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner, having completed the normal tenure in the present station, had the right to be considered for posting in a soft area as per the Transfer Policy, and directed the authorities to decide the representations within a specified timeframe.
Issues: The issue revolved around the petitioner's right to transfer after completing the normal tenure in a hard area, and the failure of the State Authorities to act on the representations for transfer.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Transfer Guidelines-Policy mandated that employees who have completed the normal tenure in hard areas have a right to be considered for posting in soft areas to avoid discrimination amongst employees.
Final Decision: The court directed the authorities to decide the petitioner's representations for transfer within a specified timeframe, in line with the Transfer Policy.
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition, is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the order(s) intended to be passed hereinafter.
3. The petitioner, working as Veterinary Officer, has filed the instant petition with the following prayer(s):-
(ii) That the respondents No.1 and 2 may be directed to post the petitioner to a place other than a Hard/Difficult/Tribal area.”
4. Case of the petitioner, as submitted by the learned counsel, is that the petitioner has completed the normal tenure as Veterinary Officer at the present station i.e. Veterinary Hospital Sangla, Tehsil Sangla, District Kinnaur, H.P. Learned counsel submits that though the State Authorities had issued the Transfer Policy on 10.07.2013, whereby, the petitioner after having completed the normal tenure of two winters and three summers in hard/difficult/remote/rural areas and had submitted representations dated 05.10.2023, (Annexure P-5) and dated 10.11.2023, (Annexure P-6) are still pending and no action has been taken till day.
5. Per contra, the learned State Counsel submits that the petitioner has already completed the normal tenure and the petitioner has neither any fundamental right nor any legal right to remain posted at the present station or choice of station.
6. The submission, so made by the learned State Counsel, appears to be genuine but at the same time this Court cannot shut its eyes, when, an employee who has completed the normal tenure in the tribal/hard/ difficult/remote areas is made to remain in such areas without inviting option or by not acting on his/her representation for posting in a soft areas but permitting others employees, who have neither served or had not served for normal tenure prescribed for such areas are allowed to remain in soft areas by action in defiance of or dehors its own policies, resulting in discrimination amongst employees in a cadre, leading to arbitrariness and violative of Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India. This Court is of the considered view that the Transfer Guidelines-Policy issued by the State Government mandating in Clauses 12 & 16, that the employees who have already served in the tribal/difficult/remote/hard areas have a right to be considered for posting in soft area(s) by transferring him out from such area(s) by adopting a continuous process of change, so as to avoid the charge of discrimination amongst its employees.
7. In entirety of the facts, narrated above since the petitioner has already completed the normal tenure in present place of posting, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall be satisfied, in case, the Respondent No.2-Directr of Animal Husbandry, Pashudhan Bhawan, Boileauganj, Himachal Pradesh, is directed to decide the representation dated 05.10.2023, (Annexure P-5) and representation dated 10.11.2023, (Annexure P-6), in terms of Clause 12 & 16 of the policy for redressal of grievance as referred to above within two weeks from today; with further direction to the aforesaid respondent to decide/examine the same within three weeks thereafter, in the light of Clause 12 & 16 of the Transfer Policy, and to ensure the implementation of its policy, equally to all concerned, to avoid charge of discrimination.
In the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition, as well as, pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, accordingly.
Employees who have completed the normal tenure in hard areas have a right to be considered for posting in soft areas to avoid discrimination amongst employees.
Mandatory and uniform application of Transfer Policy, fair and objective exercise of discretion in employee transfers.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for fair and equal treatment of employees, non-discrimination, and non-arbitrariness in state action as per Articles 14 and 16 of the C....
The Transfer Policy mandates that an employee who has already served in a difficult area should not be re-sent to such an area.
The need for fair, objective, and transparent application of the Transfer Policy to avoid arbitrariness and discrimination in state action.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of fair and equal treatment in transfer and posting, as mandated by the Transfer Policy clauses 12, 15, and 16.1, to avoid prolonged....
The central legal point established is the requirement for fair and transparent application of Transfer Policy clauses to avoid arbitrariness and discrimination in employee transfers.
Judicial intervention in transfer matters is warranted when decisions violate established transfer policies and principles of fairness, ensuring no arbitrary actions by authorities.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.