M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Kanti Sawroop – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
The State as well as the land owners, both sets are aggrieved by the award passed by the learned Reference Court on 09.09.2014. Hence, these two appeals have been preferred.
For convenience, the State (appellant in RFA No. 160 of 2015) and land owners (appellants in RFA No. 89 of 2015) are being referred to hereinafter according to their status before the learned Reference Court. The State is being referred to hereinafter as the “respondents” and the land owners as the “petitioners”.
2. Facts common to both the appeals.
2(i) Petitioners’ land measuring 17 biswas in all situated in village Shamti, Tehsil and District Solan was acquired by the respondents-State for construction of Solan-Meenus road. Out of 17 biswas, 14 biswas was comprised in Khasra No. 414/124/1, 2 biswas in Khasra No. 330/122/1 and 1 biswa was comprised in Khasra No. 330/122/2. The classification of land in these khasra numbers in the revenue record was as under :-
| 414/124/1 | (0-14 biswas) | Ghasni (Grazing land) |
| 330/122/1 | (0-2 biswas) | Charandh (Meadow) |
| 330/122/2 | (0-1 biswa) | Charandh (Meadow) |
| Total | 0-17 biswas |
|
2(ii) The Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) pass
Smt. Gulabi and etc. Vs. State of H.P.
Manoj Kumar and others Vs. State of Haryana and others
Kasturi and others Vs. State of Haryana
Lal Chand Vs. Union of India and another
Madishetti Bala Ramul (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Land Acquisition Officer
R.L. Jain (D) by LRs. Vs. DDA and others
Shree Vijay Cotton & Oil Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat
Balwan Singh and others Vs. Land Acquisition Collector & Another
Tahera Khotoon & others Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer/Land Acquisition Officer & others
The market value of acquired land should be determined based on the nature of the land, and deductions for development costs should consider the purpose of acquisition. Left-out benefit components ma....
Market value for acquired land must reflect the highest comparable sales, with deductions for development costs and interest calculated from possession date, not award date.
The court ruled that proper market value determination for acquired land must prioritize the highest bona fide transaction and that interest is owed from the date possession is taken, not from the da....
When purpose of acquisition is common, award of compensation at a uniform rate for different classification/categories of land, is, tenable.
The acquiring authority to award additional interest by way of damages @ 15% per annum from the date when respondents-claimants were dispossessed till the date of notification under Section 4 of Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of principles for determining the market value of acquired land, including the relevance of purpose of acquisition, deductions for ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.