IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SUSHIL KUKREJA, JJ.
State of H.P. - Appellant
Versus
Hardev Singh - Respondent
Cr. Appeal No. 140 of 2015
Decided on : 29-05-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecution's case background and facts of the incident. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. summary of trial court's acquittal decision. (Para 6 , 15) |
| 3. arguments of both parties regarding the acquittal. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. appellate court's powers in reviewing acquittal cases. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. standards for reversing a trial court's acquittal. (Para 12 , 13 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. the importance of minor discrepancies in witness testimonies. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. conclusion and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
Sushil Kukreja, J.
Aggrieved by the acquittal of the respondent under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short “NDPS Act”), the State has filed the instant appeal with a prayer to set aside the impugned judgment dated 25.11.2014, passed by the learned Special Judge-II, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P., in Sessions Trial No. 77 of 2014.
2. Briefly stating facts giving rise to the present appeal, as per the prosecution story are that on 23.02.2014, around 09:30 A.M., a police party was on patrolling and traffic checking duty towards Sheetala Mata temple and near bridge, one Mahindra Tempo bearing No. HP-66-1992 came from Shishamati Bihal which was signaled to stop. The aforesaid vehicle was being driven by accused Hardev Singh. The accused was asked to produce the documents of the aforesaid tempo, however, he could not produce the same and got perplexed. The Investigating Officer Yog Raj started checking the aforesaid vehicle and the accused told that nothing was in the vehicle and he was going to get the spare tyre (stepney) of the vehicle repaired. On this, Investigating Officer Yog Raj gave a hand blow on the spare tyre (stepney) of the tempo and checked the same and he suspected that some articles of theft might have been kept inside the tyre and felt it necessary to get the spare tyre (stepney) checked. Accordingly the accused was taken to H.R.T.C. workshop at Bashing. The Investigating Officer informed Pawan Kumar Sharma Regional Manager H.R.T.C. Kullu Depot about the checking of stepney and made written request in this behalf, upon which, Regional Manager constituted a team of mechanics Beni Madhav, Trilok Chand and Kanshi Ram and the aforesaid mechanics removed the stepney in the presence of accused and police officials. Inside the stepney, sticks and round shaped black coloured substance wrapped in polythene was found which on its checking was found to be charas/cannabis. The recovered charas was put in a cloth parcel and weighed with an electronic scale and its weight was found to be 1 Kg and 33 grams with cloth parcel. Two samples of 25 grams each were taken out from the recovered charas and sealed in separate cloth parcels. The big parcel was sealed with eight seals of seal 'X' while the two small parcels were sealed with four seals each of seal 'X' and the samples of seal were separately obtained on a piece of cloth and NCB-1 form and the seal after its use was handed over to Kanshi Ram. The case property, i.e., parcels containing charas and the vehicle alongwith its keys and stepney were taken into possession vide memo which was duly signed by witnesses as well as accused. The Investigating Officer Yog Raj prepared rukka and sent the same to Police Station through ASI Dhiraj for registration of case. Pursuant to which FIR was registered and on his return ASI Dhiraj handed over the case file to Investigating Officer at Bashing. The Investigating Officer prepared spot map and recorded statements of witnesses under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and also handed over special report to Addl. S.P. Nihal Chand who after making endorsement handed over the same to his Reader HHC Kashmi Ram, who also made entry in the relevant register at serial No. 17. Thereafter the Investigating Officer on his arrival at Police Station produced the case property before the then Station House Officer Sub-Inspector Sher Singh who resealed the parcels of charas with seal 'M' and afte
Muralidhar alias Gidda & another Vs. State of Karnatka
Rajesh Prasad vs. State of Bihar & another
H.D. Sundara & others vs. State of Karnataka
Yogesh Singh vs. Mahabir Singh
Shyamal Ghosh vs. State of West Bengal
The presumption of innocence strengthens after acquittal, and appellate courts should not overturn such findings unless compelling evidence demonstrates guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Appellate courts should not interfere with acquittal if trial court's view possible despite contradictions in police evidence and hostile independent witness, as suspicion cannot replace proof beyond....
Appellate courts should not interfere with acquittal in NDPS cases if trial court's view reasonable, absent perversity; material contradictions in police testimonies and non-association of independen....
Appellate courts uphold trial court acquittals in NDPS cases unless perverse; material contradictions in police testimonies, sealing discrepancies, and non-association of available independent witnes....
The acquittal of an accused cannot be overturned unless compelling evidence beyond reasonable doubt is provided, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the credibility of witness testimonies.
In NDPS acquittal appeals, courts interfere only if perverse; discrepancies in police evidence, non-association of available independent witnesses, seal issues, and custody gaps justify upholding acq....
Appeal against NDPS acquittal dismissed upholding trial court due to contradictions in official testimonies, document/FIR anomalies, weight discrepancies creating reasonable doubt; appellate interfer....
Appellate interference in acquittal limited to perverse findings or sole guilt view; upheld where contradictions, non-examination of independent witnesses, and custody lapses render prosecution case ....
Appeal against acquittal under NDPS Act dismissed due to prosecution lapses including no independent witnesses, material contradictions in evidence, sample weight variations, and chain of custody gap....
The appellate court affirmed that a trial court's acquittal may not be disturbed unless it is found to suffer from patent perversity or misreading of evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.