IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Seema Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
1.By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
(i) “That the impugned order dated 1st October, 2023 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned 2nd Appellate Authority in Appeal No.94/2024 titled as “Seema Devi versus Rajneesh Thakur and others” may kindly be quashed and set aside.
(ii) That consequently the impugned termination order dated 15th March, 2024 (Annexure P-3) passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Civil) Sadar District Bilaspur, H.P. may also be set aside.
(iii) That resultantly the petitioner may kindly be ordered to be reinstated as Part Time Multi Task Worker in Government Primary School Luharda, District Bilaspur, H.P. alongwith consequential benefits, in the interest of justice.”
2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that process was initiated by the Education Department to fill up the post of Part Time Multi Task Worker in Government Primary School, Luharda, Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P., for the year 2021-22. The petitioner alongwith the private respondent and some other candidates participated in the said process. In terms of Annexure P-1, communication dated
Mental illness qualifies as benchmark disability eligible for posts unless policy excludes; requires medical expert verification of sound mind and fitness; merit determines selection among qualified ....
The State cannot differentiate between temporary and permanent disabilities in employment; individuals must not be deprived of their rights due to flaws in disability assessment, affirming equal trea....
Termination of appointments based on disability certification must adhere to principles of natural justice, and any arbitrary action lacking notice is unlawful.
The Act mandates that only individuals with permanent disabilities meet the benchmark for reservation in employment, excluding those with temporary disabilities from eligibility.
The termination of an employee based on medical unfitness is contrary to the protections established under disability laws, requiring adjustments or supernumerary positions for disabled employees.
The use of fraudulent documentation for securing employment constitutes grave misconduct, warranting dismissal rather than mere discharge.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.