Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA
S.D. Trading Company – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks extension of arbitrator mandate under section 29a. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. section 29a mandates 12+6 month timelines; court extends beyond. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. supreme court allows extension on sufficient cause shown. (Para 7) |
| 4. sufficient cause: procedural delays, parties' participation, no objections. (Para 8) |
| 5. parties agree; covered by prior court judgments. (Para 9) |
| 6. mandate extended six months to conclude proceedings. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 29-A (4) (5) and (6) of the ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT , 1996, seeking the following relief(s):-
“It is, therefore, prayed that the present application may kindly be allowed and the time period for completing the Arbitration proceeding and passing the award in the Arbitration proceeding in respect of work C/o Providing LIS Horticulture Land from Changawati Khad to G.P. Kalbog Nagan and Ram Nagar, Tehsil Kotkhai, Distt Shimla may kindly be ordered to be extended for further period of 6 months, in the interest of law and justice.”
2. Instant petition has been filed under Section 29-A (4) (5) and (6) of the ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT , 1996
Court extends arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A upon sufficient cause like procedural delays and parties' participation, even post-18 months, to prevent defeating arbitration object by technical....
Court extends arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(5) post-expiry and termination upon sufficient cause, quashing abeyance where delays due to respondent and administration, prioritizing efficient ....
Court may extend arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4),(5) post-termination for sufficient cause not attributable to petitioners, prioritizing pragmatic and effective arbitral conclusion.
Court extends arbitrator's mandate post-termination under Section 29A(5) for sufficient cause like procedural and administrative delays not attributable to petitioner, ensuring practical, expeditious....
Court extends arbitrator mandate post-expiry under Sec 29A(4),(5) on sufficient cause like advanced proceedings, non-attributable delay, ensuring logical conclusion without petitioner fault.
Court extends arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(5) for sufficient cause including clerical errors, procedural delays, pandemic effects not attributable to parties, ensuring logical conclusion of....
The court ruled that arbitration mandates may be extended due to administrative delays not attributable to the parties, affirming the need for the timely resolution of disputes while preventing preju....
The court ruled that delays in arbitral proceedings due to administrative reasons and the COVID-19 pandemic justified extending the Arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conci....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
