SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1787

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
Hitesh Kumar And Others - Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh And Others - Respondents 
CWPOA  No 2488  of  2019 a/w CWPOA  Nos 2550, 7668,  7671, 7674,  7675
of 2019, 6204 of 2020.
Decided On : 23-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate,
For the Respondent:Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Advocate.

Horizontal reservation candidates must be confined to their quota posts, not migrated to general even if meritorious; vertical reserved candidates may adjust to general if outperforming last general selectee.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16 - Reservation policy - Horizontal reservation - Government instructions clarify that candidates under horizontal reservation securing marks at par with general candidates shall not be selected against unreserved posts but adjusted against posts reserved for respective horizontal categories; violation results in erroneous inclusion and ouster of general category candidates - Original merit list redrawn into revised merit list excluding 91 horizontally reserved candidates erroneously placed in general and main reserved categories. (Paras 4(ii), 8(i)-8(iii), 11)

(B) Reservation policy - Vertical reservation - Reserved category candidates securing higher marks than last general candidate entitled to adjustment against open general posts; no infirmity if no relaxed standards availed. (Para 12)

(C) Writ proceedings - Challenge to revised merit list during pendency not maintainable without amendment, notice to affected parties and pleadings; liberty granted for separate remedy. (Paras 11, 12)

(D) Malafides and evaluation marks - Bald allegations without specifics or arraying parties untenable; experience marks awarded per notified criteria. (Paras 13, 14)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners challenged original merit list for multipurpose assistant posts alleging improper adjustment of horizontal reserved category candidates (BPL etc.) against general unreserved and main reserved posts in violation of instructions, leading to excess selections and exclusion of general candidates; corporation defended per law on reservations; during pendency, committee prepared revised merit list reassigning horizontal points, excluding 91 erroneous inclusions.

Findings of Court:
Prayer for redrawing original merit list granted as fulfilled by revised merit list; petitioners to be considered against 91 vacated posts per revised list; two petitioners in revised merit directed for appointment with notional seniority/pay from original appointment date of others but actual benefits from petition filing; corporation at liberty to retain excluded incumbents against unfilled/vacant/supernumerary posts.

Issues: Propriety of adjusting horizontal reserved candidates in general posts; validity of revised merit list; permissibility of vertical reserved candidates migrating to general posts; allegations of malafides and improper experience evaluation.

Ratio Decidendi: Horizontal reserved candidates barred from general posts to protect category quotas; revised list addresses core grievance; vertical migration lawful per Supreme Court precedents absent relaxed standards proof; new challenges require proper procedure including notice.

Result: Writ petitions disposed with directions for consideration/appointment per revised merit list.

Table of Content
1. petitions consolidated; lead case for adjudication. (Para 2 , 3)
2. tmpa posts advertised; petitioners qualified written test. (Para 4)
3. selection per indra sawhney; participation estoppel. (Para 5)
4. horizontal bpl excess in ur violating instructions. (Para 6)
5. committee revised list excluding 91 candidates. (Para 7)
6. revised list grants redraw relief; petitioners considered. (Para 8 , 9)
7. merit petitioners appointed with notional 2018 benefits. (Para 10)
8. revised list challenge needs affected parties' notice. (Para 11)
9. meritorious sc/st migrate to general category. (Para 12)
10. no malafides or experience marking irregularities. (Para 13 , 14)
11. writs disposed with appointment directions. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

Ranjan Sharma, J.

Since the factual matrix and the issue involved and the relief(s) claimed are pari materia, therefore, with the consent of Learned Counsel for the parties, all these petitions are taken up together for adjudication.

2. At the very outset, Learned Counsel(s) for the petitioners states that CWPOA No. 2550 of 2019, titled as Arif Hussain & Others vs State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, may be treated as the ‘Lead Case’ for adjudicating all connected petitions. Prayer being innocuous is not opposed by the Learned Respondent Counsel(s) and therefore, this Court proceeds ahead for adjudicating the claim herein.

FACTUAL MATRIX IN LEAD CASE: CWPOA No 2550 OF 2019 :

3. Petitioners, Arif Hussain and 48 others in Lead Case, CWPOA No.2550 of 2019, have come up, before this Court, seeking the following relief(s):-

“(i). That the respondents may very kindly be directed to redraw the result of Transport Multipurpose Assistants category wise by placing the sub-category candidates in their respective categories and replacing them with other candidates falling in order of merit from 3816 candidates who had qualified the written test strictly restricting the whole exercise in all the categories to the applicants in the present original application.”

4. Case as set up by Learned Counsel for the petitioners in Lead Case CWPOA No. 2550 of 2019, Arif Hussain & Others versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and Others and other connected petitions is that the Respondent-Corporation issued an Advertisement dated 03.08.2017 [Annexure A-1] and a Corrigendum in September 2017 [Annexure A-3] for filling of 1300 posts of Transport Multipurpose Assistant(s) (herein referred to as TMPA) from general category and other reserved categories under vertical and horizontal reserved categories, reads as under:

HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORTION, SHIMLA- 171003
CORRIGENDUM WITH REGARD TO INCREASE IN NUMBER OF POSTS FROM 1000 TO 1300

In continuation to the advertisement dated 03.08.2017 appeared in the News Papers “The Tribune”, “Divya Himachal” “Punjab Kesari” & Amar Ujala (HP Edition), following Amendments/Corrigendum are being made:

1. The number of posts for TMPAs has been increased from 1000 to 1300. The detail of category-wise number of vacancies are as under:

DETAILS OF CATEGORY-WISE NUMBER OF VACANCIES

2. The last date of submission of online applications is 31.08.2017 by 05:00 PM along with all the relevant certificates accompanied by the original demand draft of Rs.100/- in the name of Financial Advisor cum Chief Accounts Officer, HRTC, Shimla-171003 in the nearest Regional Office.

3. The admit cards will be available on the HRTC website www.hrtchp.com from 07.09.2017 onwards and the written test will be held on 17.09.2017.

4. The Skill Development Trainees who have been found to be involved in embezzlement cases shall not be eligible for these posts.

Sd/-
Managing Director,
Himachal Road Transport Corporation,
Shimla-171003.


4(i). Grievance of petitioners in Lead Case is that they belong to General-UR Category and other reserved categories (under vertically and horizontal) since the petitioners were eligible for the post of Transport Multipurpose Assistant [referred to as ‘TMPA’] in terms of Advertisement dated 03.08.2017 [Ann


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top