SANJEEV KUMAR
Mahesh Chander Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJEEV KUMAR, J.
1. Petitioner No. 1 is a consumer of electric energy supplied by the respondents and is identified by Consumer ID No. 0101020005173 and Installation No. GHB/1974. He claims to have executed a lease deed in favour of petitioner No. 2 qua the premises situated in Khasra No. 360/361 Opposite Bakshi Nagar, Pulli Akhnoor Road, Jammu, where the subject electric connection has been sanctioned by the respondents for a load of 5KV-90KV (commercial). As is apparent from the documents on record, it is a three phase and four wire connection sanctioned by the respondents in favour of the petitioners for the aforementioned commercial load.
2. The petitioners are aggrieved and have assailed the monthly bill of supply of electricity raised by the respondents for the month of January, 2020.
3. It is the contention of the petitioners that right from the year 2016, when the sanction was accorded for revision of load of 05 KV to 90KV, the petitioner No. 1 has been regularly paying the electricity bills as raised by the respondents every month and has not committed a single default in clearing the electricity bills qua the connection in question. However, the petitioner No. 1 w
A.K. Kraipak vs. Union of India
Delhi Transport Corporation vs. DTC Mazdoor Congress
Mohinder Singh Gill vs. Election Commission of India
Swadeshi Cotton Mills vs. Union of India
Smt. Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel
Whirlpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.