IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
Javed Iqbal Wani, J.
ASEL ARS Sports Private Limited
Versus
UT of J&K and Ors.
CM No.795/2021 in WP (C) No.158/2021
Decided on 22.2.2021
Government Contract-Tender-Evaluation of applicant/petitioner as lowest bidder by respondents/non-applicants in earlier e-tender will not lend any support to petitioner/applicant for present case in view of stand taken by respondents/non-applicants that evaluation stands cancelled in terms of communication dated 20.08.2020 which although being denied to have been communicated to applicant/petitioner, yet remains staring at applicant/petitioner-Presence of same as on date cannot be overlooked by this court more so when same is not under challenge or else under stay-In addition thereto nature of controversy raised by applicant in writ petition and infringement of rights complained thereof on one hand and stand taken by official respondents controverting and resisting controversy and claims lodged by petitioner on other hand would require to be determined while considering main writ petition-Case set-up by applicant/petitioner seemingly per-se do not constitute a very strong prima-facie case in favour of petitioner/applicant-Application dismissed-Dismissal of application shall not mean to have any effect upon determination of merits/issues of case involved in main petition. (Para 26)
Result-Application dismissed.
Order
Javed Iqbal Wani, J.—This order shall dispose of application of interim relief being CM 795/2021.
2. In terms of order dated 04.02.2021 notice was issued in first instance to respondents 1 to 3 consequent upon which Mr. K.D.S Kotwal Dy. AG, appeared and was granted time for filing objections. On 08.02.2021 when matter came up for consideration, Ms. Tak entered appearance for respondent No. 2. Objections stand filed by the respondent No. 1 to 3.
3. In the application in hand petitioner prays for following reliefs: -
“The hon’ble court may please to stay the impugned decision dated 23.12.2020 with respect to the ousting the petitioner company from the tendering process and declaring the respondent no. 4 as lowest bidder and to restrain the respondents from issuing formal allotment order in favour of respondent no. 4 with respect to contract for construction of Global Category Synthetic Hockey Surface including allied civil works with annual maintenance of 3 years for Turf and Sprinkle at K.K.Haku Stadium Jammu in reference to notice inviting tender, tender notice e-NIT No. 05/5 of 2020 dated 18.09.2020 till the outcome of the main petition.”
4. The interim reliefs supra are being sought on the basis of following main reliefs being prayed by the applicant/petitioner in the writ petition: -
(a) An appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the decision of the respondent No. 2 and 3 dated 23.12.2020 in ousting the petitioner company in the technical bid by giving remarks “non-responsive” on the basis of a highly illegal and uncalled for Corrigendum issued under no. SC/CDJ/1123-26 dated 09.11.2020 with respect to allotment of contract for construction of Global Category Synthetic Hockey Surface including allied civil works with Annual Maintenance of 3 years for Turf and sprinkler at K.K. haku Stadium, Jammu in reference to Notice inviting tender, Tender Notice e-NIT No. 05/05 of 2020 dated 18.09.2020.
(b) An appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the decision dated 23.12.2020 whereby the respondent no. 4 has been declared as lowest bidder with bid amount of Rs. 5,39,78,977.37 for allotment of contract for construction of Global Category Synthetic Hockey Surface including allied civil works with Annual Maintenance of 3 years for Turf and sprinkler at K.K. haku Stadium Jammu in reference to Notice inviting tender, Tender Notice e-NIT no. 05/05 of 2020 dated 18.09.2020.
(c) An appropriate writ, order of direction in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to declare the petitioner company as qualified in the technical bid and declare it as lowest bidder (L1) having submitted its financial bid at Rs. 5.11. Crore which is admittedly lower than the financial bid of respondent No. 4 and allot the contract for construction of Global Category Synthetic Hockey surface including allied civil works with Annual maintenance of 3 years for Turf and sprinkler at K.K. Haku Stadium Jammu, in reference to Notice inviting Tender, tender Notice e-NIT No. 05/05 of 2020 dated 18.09.2020 to the petitioner company.
(d) An appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to issue formal allotment order for construction of Global Category Synthetic Hockey Surface including allied civil works with Annual Maintenance of 3 years for Turf and sprinkler at K.K. Haku Stadium Jammu, in reference to notice inviting tender notice e-NIT No. 05/05 of 2020 dated 18.9.2020 in favour of the respondent No. 4 pursuant to its illegal declaration as lowest bidder.
(e) Any other relief, which this Hon’ble court in the facts and circumstances of the case deems fit and proper.
5. The petitioner implores for the aforesaid reliefs in the writ petition on the premise that the respondents 2 & 3 issued an e-Tender No. 05/5 of 2020 dated 18.09.2020 with regard to construction of Global Category Synthetic Hockey Surface including a
Raunaq International Limited v. I.V.R Construction Ltd and Others
SupremeToday
The court highlighted the importance of adhering to the Standard Bidding Document (SBD) and Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) requirements, including the provision of accurate information, and emphasized ....
The decision-making process of the tendering authority should be respected unless there is mala fide or perversity, and the court should only interfere in tender matters in furtherance of public inte....
Point of law: Supreme Court held that any contract of public service should not be interfered with lightly and in any case, there should not be any interim order derailing entire process of services ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the decision making process in contractual matters can be reviewed if it is shown to be arbitrary, unreasonable, or if it violates the Wednesb....
Judicial review of tender processes is limited to ensuring fairness and transparency. Tendering authorities may correct inadvertent errors in technical evaluations during the stipulated process windo....
The authority to cancel a tender prevails under administrative discretion, based on the rationale of maintaining integrity, fairness, and transparency in public procurement processes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.