SINDHU SHARMA
Bittu Ram – Appellant
Versus
Suram Chand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This reference is under section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure which has been made by the then Sub-Judge Ramban. The facts in the suit giving rise to this reference are as under;
2. A civil suit for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendant from interfering in possession of the land of plaintiffs measuring 01 kanal and 06 marla comprising Khasra No. 480 situated in village Parnote Tehsil and District Ramban was filed by 09 villagers against the 12 persons of the same village. The trial court passed ad interim order on 26.09.2009 restraining the defendant from interfering till objections were filed and considered. After hearing the parties, the order of injunction dated 26.09.2009, however, was vacated by the trial Court vide its order dated 23.12.2009. The plaintiff challenged the order vacating ad interim order by filing a miscellaneous appeal before District Judge, Ramban. This appeal was allowed by the District Judge Ramban vide order dated 25.10.2010 with a direction to the parties to maintain status quo on spot.
3. The defendants challenged the order dated 25.10.2010 by filing a revision under section 115 of CPC. When this revision i.e. C. Rev. No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.