Back
MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Vinkal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. need for secrecy in recruitment process (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenge to contracts with tainted companies (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. previous irregularities in exam processes (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. modification of tender terms regarding blacklisting (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. concerns about fairness in public examinations (Para 12 , 14) |
| 6. defense of tender process by respondent (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. measures taken for fair examination conduct (Para 22 , 23) |
| 8. private respondents' experiences with examination conduct (Para 36 , 37) |
| 9. issues for judicial consideration (Para 41 , 42) |
| 10. maintainability of writ petition based on locus standi (Para 46 , 48 , 50) |
| 11. court directives based on committee report (Para 64 , 71 , 72) |
JUDGMENT :
MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, J.
1. There can be no better prologue to this judgment than the words of George Orwell:
2. By this petition, the petitioners herein are seeking a fair process of recruitment with absolute secrecy, not only by the recruiting agency but also by the agency conducting the examination. They have raised this Orwellian concern about the alleged possibility of modern technology being misus
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
