SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(J&K) 419

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
JAVED IQBAL WANI, J.
Intizamiya Committee Dargah through Haji Abdul Ahad Akhoon and Others – Petitioners
Versus
Union Territory of J&K and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 1044 of 2023, C.C.P. (S) No. 181 of 2023
Decided On : 06-09-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Jehangir Iqbal Ganai, R.A. Bhat.
For the Respondents: Mubeen Wani, M.I. Dar, Ruaani A. Baba.

The legal framework for declaring a property as Wakaf under the Jammu and Kashmir Wakaf Act of 1978 and the subsequent implications of such declaration under the provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995.

Headnote:

Wakaf Property - Jammu and Kashmir Wakaf Board - Sections 67, 68 & 69 of the Waqf Act, 1995 - The judgment discusses the declaration of Ziyarat Sharief Syed Khazir Sahab as a Wakaf property under the Jammu and Kashmir Wakaf Act of 1978 and the subsequent takeover by the Wakaf Board under the provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995. It highlights the legal framework of Wakaf laws in Jammu and Kashmir, the procedure for declaring a property as Wakaf, and the implications of such declaration under different Acts.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the takeover of Ziyarat Sharief Syed Khazir Sahab by the Jammu and Kashmir Wakaf Board, claiming that the property was proprietary and not donated to any Wakaf. The petitioner argued that the Board's action was illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Ziyarat had been declared as a Wakaf property under the Jammu and Kashmir Wakaf Act of 1978, and the subsequent takeover by the Board was in accordance with the provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995. The court refrained from expressing an opinion on the validity of the declaration and dismissed the petition.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the proprietary nature of the Ziyarat, the legality of the Board's actions under different Wakaf Acts, and the procedural requirements for declaring a property as Wakaf.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the legal significance of the declaration of a property as Wakaf under the Jammu and Kashmir Wakaf Act of 1978, the procedure for such declaration, and the implications of the declaration under subsequent Wakaf Acts. It clarified the legal status and binding nature of the Special Officer's decision on declaring a property as Wakaf.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the contempt notices were recalled, proceedings dropped, and the petition was disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

JAVED IQBAL WANI, J.

1. In the instant petition the petitioner has questioned Order No. 03 of 2023 dated 01.04.2023 (for short the impugned order) issued by the Jammu and Kashmir Wakaf Board (for short the Board) whereby the management of Ziyarat Sharief Syed Khazir Sahab at Rayil, Gund Kangan and its allied properties (“for short the Ziyarat”) have been ordered to be taken over by the Board in terms of Sections 67, 68 & 69 of the Waqf Act, 1995 (for short the Act of 1995) besides having thrown challenge to Order No. 17/JKWB of 2022 dated 17.12.2022 issued by the Board whereby it came to be provided that the Board has taken over all the control and management of the Shrines/Ziyarats including the assets/properties in the whole of Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and any Association or local Auqaf in respect of such Wakfs shall be void-ab-initio.

The petitioner has also questioned letter dated 08.04.2023 addressed by the Board to the petitioner informing him about taking over of the Ziyarat on 08.04.2023 and further calling upon him not to spend any income on the same and in the event of breach, action under Act would be initiated.

It is significant to note here that in view of the challenge thrown to the order impugned dated 01.04.2023, the validity or otherwise of the aforesaid consequential orders is not required to be adverted to.

2. The petitioner has challenged the order impugned dated 01.04.2023 fundamentally on the ground that the Ziyarat including the land underneath thereto is proprietary land of the petitioner and has never been donated to any Wakaf or Ziyarat and that its use has only been allowed for the charitable purposes.

3. It is being claimed by the petitioner that Ziyarat has not been declared as a “Wakaf Property” in terms of Sections 5 and 6 of the Jammu and Kashmir Wakaf Act of 1978 (for short the Act of 1978) and in absence of any such declaration, respondent Board could not take recourse to Sections 67 to 69 of the Act of 1995, as such, the action of the respondent Board is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.

4. It is being further urged by the petitioner that respondent Board declaring a particularly property as a Wakaf Property, a definite procedure as prescribed is required to be followed which includes conducting of a survey and holding an enquiry in tune with the principles of natural justice and that since such course has not been adopted by the respondent Board while issuing impugned order, same violates the rights enshrined under the Article 226 and 30 of the Constitution of India.

5. Per contra, objections to the petition have been filed by the respondent Board wherein it is being averred that the subject matter of the petition had been declared as a Wakaf in the year 1985 under the Act of 1978 and that a formal declaration in this regard thereof has been made by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir. The respondent Board has placed on record SRO 510 dated 11.12.1985 issued by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir whereby amongst others Ziyarat Sharief Syed Khazir Sahab at Rayil, Gund Kangan has been declared as a Wakaf property in the year 1985 in terms of Act of 1978 supra which was in vogue then and that no new or further proceedings in this regard were required to be undertaken under the Act of 1995, as action taken under the Act of 1978 is deemed to have been taken under the Act of 1995.

Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. Before proceeding to deal with the issues raised in the instant petition, it would be appropriate to give a brief background of the Wakaf law in the Jammu and Kashmir being relevant and germane herein.

Initially in the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir Wakaf Act 1978 came to be enacted on 09.05.1978 (for short the Act of 1978) providing for the better administration and supervision of the Wakfs in the State. The said Act was repealed by Jammu and Kashmir Wakafs Act 2001 (for short the Act of 2001) enacted on 16.04.2001.

Secti

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top