VIVEK AGARWAL
Vijay Kumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Awadhesh Pratap Singh Vishwavidyalaya &O (Madhya Pradesh) – Respondent
ORDER :
1. These bunch of petitions raise similar issue. One of the petition namely W.P. No. 5984/2005 is at the behest of the complainant Professor Vijay Kumar Agrawal claiming that he was appointed as 'Lecturer' in Chemistry on 28/01/1985. Thereafter, he was directly recruited and appointed as 'Reader' in Awadhesh Pratap Singh University w.e.f. 30/09/1993 and then his case was considered for promotion to the post of 'Professor' under the Career Advancement Scheme in the University departments and in terms of said Career Advancement Scheme, he was granted promotion from the post of 'Reader' to 'Professor' w.e.f. 30th September, 2001 Annexure P-12.
2. Petitioner's grievance is that private respondents i.e. respondent nos. 4 to 11 out of whom, some of the private respondents have filed individual petitions before this High Court namely, Dr. Rahasyamani Mishra petitioner in W.P. No. 9793/2019, respondent no. 9; Dr. Anjali Shrivastava, respondent no. 10; Ms. Deepa Shrivastava & Dr. Rajiv Dubey who are petitioners in W.P. No. 10150/2019; respondent no. 7 Dadan Prasad Tiwari petitioner in W.P. No. 10042/2019; and respondent no. 8 Dr. C.D. Singh petitioner in W.P. No. 9937/2019 were grante
Director General of Posts and others Vs. B. Ravindran and another (1997) 1 SCC 641
Dr. M.S. Mudhol and another Vs. S.D. Halegkar and others (1993) 3 SCC 591
J. C. Yadav and others Vs. State of Haryana and others (1990) 2 SCC 189
J. K. Vasavada and others Vs. Chandrakanta Chimanlal Bhavsar and another AIR 1975 SC 2089.
K.H. Siraj Vs. High Court of Kerala and others (2006) 6 SCC 395
Mangilal Vs. State of M.P. (2004) 2 SCC 447
Prabhakar Ramakrishna Jodh Vs. A.L. Pande and another (1965) 2 SCR 713
State of Bombay Vs. United Motors (India) Ltd. AIR 1953 SC 252 P. 258
Promotions to the post of Professor must comply with U.G.C. regulations requiring eight years of service as Reader, and failure to provide a hearing before annulling promotions violates principles of....
The main legal principle established is that UGC Regulations, 2010 have prospective effect and candidates who fulfill eligibility criteria before the enforcement of the regulations can be considered ....
It is not necessary for Selection Committee to give reasons for its conclusion, suffice to state, Supreme Court had given a finding to that effect in cases where the rules do not contemplate so. Ther....
Promotion of teachers must relate back to the date of eligibility per UGC regulations, not just the interview date.
Past services of a professor can be counted for promotion under UGC regulations, regardless of whether the previous pay scale was higher than UGC standards.
The discretionary power to relax rules should be exercised sparingly to meet exceptional situations, and the principle of 'equal pay for equal work' applies to grant financial benefits for dischargin....
Recruitment and Promotion Rules - Promotion - Benefits of - A person, who performs duties of higher office, must get salary of same post. He cannot waive of his fundamental/legal right to get higher ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.