SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 653

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VIVEK AGARWAL, J.
Professor Vijay Kumar Agrawal - Appellant
Versus
Awadhesh Pratap Singh Vishwavidyalaya &O (Madhya Pradesh) - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 5984 of 2005, WRIT PETITION No. 9937 of 2019, WRIT PETITION No. 10042 of 2019, WRIT PETITION No. 10150 of 2019
Decided on : 13-04-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :SHRI ANIL KHARE - SENIOR ADVOCATE ASSISTED BY SMT. TANVI AGARWAL
For the Respondent:SHRI VIBHUDENDRA MISHRA - ADVOCATE

Promotions to the post of Professor must comply with U.G.C. regulations requiring eight years of service as Reader, and failure to provide a hearing before annulling promotions violates principles of natural justice.

Headnote:(A) Madhya Pradesh Universities Act, 1973 - Ordinance No. 4

(B) - University Grants Commission Regulations - Promotion criteria for Professors - Petitioners challenged promotions of private respondents as Professors, claiming violation of U.G.C. norms requiring eight years of service as Reader - Court found that promotions were granted in violation of these norms. (Paras 2, 4, 46, 66)

(B) Administrative Law - Principles of natural justice - Court emphasized the need for a fair hearing before annulling promotions, referencing the requirement of opportunity to be heard. (Paras 21, 62)

Facts of the case:
The case involved multiple petitions regarding the promotion of university faculty members, where the petitioner claimed that promotions were granted to junior faculty in violation of U.G.C. regulations.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the promotions were invalid as they did not comply with the eight-year service requirement and directed the university to reconsider promotions based on proper eligibility criteria.

Issues: The main issues included whether the promotions violated U.G.C. regulations and the necessity of a hearing before annulling promotions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the U.G.C. regulations mandating eight years of service as a Reader for promotion to Professor must be adhered to, and that failure to provide a hearing before annulling promotions constituted a violation of natural justice.

Result: Petitions disposed of with directions for reconsideration of promotions.

ORDER :

1. These bunch of petitions raise similar issue. One of the petition namely W.P. No. 5984/2005 is at the behest of the complainant Professor Vijay Kumar Agrawal claiming that he was appointed as 'Lecturer' in Chemistry on 28/01/1985. Thereafter, he was directly recruited and appointed as 'Reader' in Awadhesh Pratap Singh University w.e.f. 30/09/1993 and then his case was considered for promotion to the post of 'Professor' under the Career Advancement Scheme in the University departments and in terms of said Career Advancement Scheme, he was granted promotion from the post of 'Reader' to 'Professor' w.e.f. 30th September, 2001 Annexure P-12.

2. Petitioner's grievance is that private respondents i.e. respondent nos. 4 to 11 out of whom, some of the private respondents have filed individual petitions before this High Court namely, Dr. Rahasyamani Mishra petitioner in W.P. No. 9793/2019, respondent no. 9; Dr. Anjali Shrivastava, respondent no. 10; Ms. Deepa Shrivastava & Dr. Rajiv Dubey who are petitioners in W.P. No. 10150/2019; respondent no. 7 Dadan Prasad Tiwari petitioner in W.P. No. 10042/2019; and respondent no. 8 Dr. C.D. Singh petitioner in W.P. No. 9937/2019 were granted promotion as 'Professor' in violation of the U.G.C. norms and the University regulations from a date when they had not completed eight years of service as 'Reader' which is a mandatory requirement according to the petitioner Dr. Vijay Kumar Agrawal. Thus, giving them an undue march over the petitioner in the cadre of 'Professor'.

3. Consequently in the said petition, relief is sought to set aside the orders Annexures P-12 and P-13 dated 8/10/2003 and 24/04/2004 as they adversely affect the petitioner and to command respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 to restore the seniority of the petitioner.

4. The private respondents have filed their individual petitions mainly challenging the orders passed by the Secretary and His Excellency the Governor and Chancellor of Awadhesh Pratap Singh University, Rewa annulling the promotion orders of individuals namely Dr. Smt. Ugam Kumari Chauhan, Dr. Ajay Kumar Awasthy, Dr. Rahasyamani Mishra, Dr. C.D. Singh, Dr. Anjali Shrivastava, Dr. Deepa Shrivastava, Dr. Rajiv Dubey and Dr. Dadan Prasad Tiwari treating them to be in violation of the Ordinance No. 4 (B) under Madhya Pradesh Universities Act, 1973 and also being in violation of the instructions issued by the University Grants Commission from time to time.

5. Shri Anil Khare, learned Senior Advocate, Shri K.C. Ghildiyal, learned Senior Advocate, Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, learned Advocate, Shri Arpan Pawar, learned counsel and Shri Vibhudendra Mishra, learned counsel are heard. Shri Vibhudendra Mishra, learned counsel appearing for Dr. Vijay Kumar Agrawal submits that his only grievance is that the private respondents could not have stolen march over the petitioner Dr. Vijay Kumar Agrawal as they were junior to him in the cadre of 'Reader' and in violation of the Ordinance and other provisions contained in the U.G.C. regulations, they have been given a march over the petitioner and thus with the passing of the order Annexure P-17 in W.P. No. 10150/2019, his grievance stands ventilated if the said order which is under challenge in the connected writ petitions filed at the instance of the private respondents is maintained.

6. Shri Anil Khare, learned Senior Advocate submits that he will be addressing the court treating W.P. No. 10150/2019 as the lead case and will be referring to the documents annexed therewith. He submits that Annexure P-16 is the order of promotion dated 8/10/2003 whereby promotion to the post of 'Professor' was given from different dates starting from 2nd November, 2000. (Dr. Smt. Ugam Kumari Chouhan 19th November, 2004), (Dr. Ajay Kumar Awasthy 19th November, 2004), (Dr. Rahasyamani Mishra - 19th January, 2000), (Dr. Anjali Shrivastava 30th January, 2002), (Dr. Deepa Shrivastava 15th July, 2002), (Dr. Rajiv Dube 16th July, 2002) and Dr. Chandradev Singh was giv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top