SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(JK) 14

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Parmila Devi …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. S. C. Mansotra, Adv.
vs Director Social Welfare Department and .…. Respondent(s)
others Through: Ms. Pallvi Sharma, Adv. vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAGfor Nos. 1 to 4 Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

Residency at the time of application is the sole criterion for selection as Anganwadi Worker; marital status post-selection does not disqualify a candidate.

Headnote:(A) Writ Jurisdiction - Selection Process - The petitioner challenged the selection of respondent No. 5 as Anganwadi Worker on grounds of residency and marriage location - The court found that the selection criteria only required residency at the time of application, not marital status post-selection. (Paras 1-10)

(B) Legal Standing - The court emphasized that the official respondents had the authority to select candidates based on the criteria set forth in the advertisement, and marriage after selection does not disqualify a candidate. (Paras 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to quash the selection of respondent No. 5, arguing that her marriage to someone from a different village disqualified her, despite respondent No. 5 being a resident at the time of application.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the selection process adhered to the stipulated criteria, and the petitioner's arguments regarding residency post-marriage were unfounded.

Issues: The main issue was whether the marital status of a candidate affects their eligibility for selection as Anganwadi Worker.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that residency at the time of application is the sole criterion for selection, and subsequent marriage does not affect eligibility.

Result: Petition dismissed.

ORDER :

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for quashing the selection of the respondent No. 5 as Anganwadi Worker in Anganwadi Center for Upper Bhagwah, who was selected vide select list dated 22.12.2005 and directing the official respondents i.e. respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to select and appoint the petitioner as Anganwadi Worker in Anganwadi Center for Upper Bhagwah.

2. The petitioner has challenged the select list on the grounds that the official respondents have illegally selected the respondent No. 5 who had got married to a village, namely, Prem Nagar which falls about 30 kms away from the ward/village in question i.e. Upper Bhagwah in another Tehsil Thathri, but still she was retained by the official respondents in the select list. It is stated that the petitioner has permanently settled after her marriage in the said ward/village.

3. The petitioner claims to have submitted the objections against the select list published by the official respondents, whereby respondent No. 5 was appointed as Anganwadi Worker in Anganwadi Center Upper Bhagwah.

4. Respondent No. 3 has filed the response stating therein that the Advertisement Notification was issued on 17.02.2005 by respondent No. 1. The respondent No. 5 was possessing higher merit as compared to the petitioner, who was less meritorious as such, she was not selected by the official respondents for the post in question. It is also averred that at the time of issuance of above advertisement, the respondent No. 5 was unmarried as mentioned in the application form and other related papers submitted by the respondent No. 5 for selection as Anganwadi Worker in Anganwadi Centre, Upper Bhagwah.

5. After considering the applications submitted by all the participants, the select list was issued on 22.12.2005 whereas the marriage of respondent No. 5 was solemnized on 06.03.2006 regarding which a certificate issued by the Pandit has been placed on record.

6. Mr. S. C. Mansotra, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that once the respondent No. 5 has been married to a person who is residing in a village which is at least 30 kms away from the Anganwadi Center in question as such, the petitioner has a better claim vis a vis the respondent No.5 for engagement as Anganwari worker in Anganwadi Center Upper Bhagwah. Mr. Mansotra has further contended that the candidate must be permanent resident of the panchayat or ward/village where the Anganwadi Center is located.

7. Per contra, Ms. Pallvi Sharma, learned counsel appearing vice Mr.Ravinder Gupta, AAG for official respondents has vehemently argued that at the time when the respondent No. 5 applied for the post of Anganwadi Worker, she was the resident of the area where the Anganwadi Center Upper Bhagwah was located. Even if, she has solemnized marriage after the issuance of the select list, the same cannot have any effect on the selection of respondent No. 5.

8. Heard and perused the record.

9. The record depicts that the petitioner was residing at Village Bhagwah, VPO Bhagwah, Tehsil and District Doda at the time of submission of her application for the post of Anganwadi Worker for Anganwadi Center Upper Bhagwah. The requirement of the Advertisement was that the candidate must be resident of the area where the Anganwadi Center is located. It is not denied by the petitioner that the respondent No. 5 was not residing at a place where the Anganwadi Center was located, at the time of submission of application by the respondent No.5.

10. The sole contention of the petitioner is that she has solemnized marriage as such, the candidate who is residing at a place where the Anganwadi Center is located has a better claim over a candidate who has married away from the Anganwadi Center. The contention of the petitioner has been taken note of by this Court only for the purpose of rejection because as per the advertisement the only requirement is that the candidate must be the resident of the area/village where the Anganwadi Center is located

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top