HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
(IN THE COURT OF REGISTRAR JUDICIAL AT JAMMU)
OWP 974/2018
c/w
OWP 305/2008
OWP 1129/2011
OWP 1169/2011
OWP 1170/2011
OWP 1262/2018
OWP 1372/2018
OWP 1375/2018
OWP 2008/2018
WP(C) 2726/2019
WP(C) 1882/2020
WP(C) 1960/2021
Union of India Th. ADM Commandant
……Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
V/s
Through: - Mr. Rudresh Thakur, Assisting Counsel
Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI in OWP 974/2018
Ms. Ishna Vaid, Advocate
Vice Mr. Uday Bhaskar, Advocate in
WP(C) 2726/2019 & WP(C) 1882/2020
Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate
Vice Mr. C.S Azad, Advocate in WP(C) 1960/2021
Mr. Srijan Mahajan, Advocate
Vice Mr. Harshwardhan Gupta, Advocate in
WP(C) 1960/2021
Mr. Sahil Mushtaq, Advocate
Vice Mr. Rahul Pant, Advocate in OWP 1169/2011
State of J&K and others …… Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Sugandh Gandotra, Assisting Counsel
Vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr.AAG for R- 2, 5, 6 & 9 in
OWP 974/2018
Mr. Lawanya Sharma, Advocate for R- 16, 59 to 68 in
OWP 1262/2018
ORDER :
Hon’ble Court vide its Order dt. 05.06.2024 had granted last opportunity to the parties to complete the pleadings in all the connected matters.
OWP 974/2018
It is reported by the dealing assistant that respondent nos. 1 to 16 are official respondents and respondent nos. 18, 19, 25, 31 to 39 and 41 have S. No.27 caused their appearance through their respective counsels. However, objections on behalf of respondent nos. 25 and 31 have been filed.
It is further reported by the dealing assistant that fresh particulars of respondent nos. 17, 20 to 24, 26 to 30, 40 and 42 have not been provided.
OWP 1170/2011
It is reported by the dealing assistant that objections have been filed.
So, pleading are complete.
OWP 305/2008
It is reported by the dealing assistant that objections have not been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 5 WP(C) 1960/2021 It is reported by the dealing assistant that objections have been filed.
So, pleadings are complete.
WP(C) 2726/2019
It is reported by the dealing assistant that objections have been filed.
So, pleadings are complete.
OWP 2008/2018
It is reported by the dealing assistant that objections have been filed.
So, pleadings are complete.
OWP 1372/2018
It is reported by the dealing assistant that objections on behalf of respondent nos. 21 to 24, 26 & 30 have been filed. However, respondent nos. 16, 20, 27 & 28 have appeared through their counsels.
It is further reported by the dealing assistant that fresh particulars of respondent nos. 17 to 19, 25, 29, 31 to 39 have not been provided.
WP(C) 1882/2020
It is reported by the dealing assistant that objections on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 5 have been filed and objections on behalf of respondent nos. 6 to 8 are not required, in compliance to Hon’ble Court order dt. 19.07.2022.
OWP 1169/2011
It is reported by the dealing assistant that objections have been filed by respondent nos. 1 & 2 and objections on behalf of respondent no. 3 are not required, in compliance to Hon’ble Court order dt. 19.07.2024.
OWP1129/2011
It is reported by the dealing assistant that objections have been filed.
So, pleadings are complete.
OWP 1262/2018
It is reported by the dealing assistant that respondent nos. 1 to 13 are official respondents and respondent nos. 14, 55, 56 and 58 have appeared in person. However, respondent no. 16 has caused appearance through his counsel and respondent nos. 35, 36, 53 and 54 are set-exparte.
It is further reported by the dealing assistant that fresh particulars of respondent nos. 15, 17 to 34, 37 to 52 and 57 have not been provided.
OWP 1375/2018
It is reported by the dealing assistant that respondent nos. 1 to 16 are official respondents and respondent nos. 26, 27, 28 and 30 have filed their objections. However, respondent nos. 31, 23 & 34 appeared through their counsels and respondent nos. 23, 31, 32 and 34 have not filed their objections.
It is further reported by the concerned clerk that petitioner have not provided registered covers for service of the respondent nos. 17 to 22, 24, 25, 29, 33, 35 & 36.
Since, last and final opportunity was granted. Therefore, Registry is directed to place the matter before the Hon’ble Court in the 5th week of August, 2024 for kind orders.
(Sandeep Kour) Registrar Judicial Jammu 29.07.2024 Sapna
The court emphasized the necessity of compliance with procedural requirements in civil matters, ensuring timely submissions of pleadings and objections.
Compliance with court orders is essential to avoid contempt proceedings.
Adherence to procedural timelines is critical for ensuring fairness in judicial proceedings.
Contempt petition closed upon proof of compliance with court order.
Compliance with court order leads to closure of contempt proceedings.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the discretionary power of the court to permit subsequent pleadings under O.8 R.9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the purpose of such ple....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.