SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(J&K) 190

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SANJAY DHAR, J.
Abdul Gani and another – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K and others – Respondents
WP(C) No. 395 of 2025 CM No. 851 of 2025 
Decided On : 07-04-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Irfaan Khan, Advocate Mr. Nauman Yaseen Khan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG.

Failure to issue a final award within two years results in the lapse of land acquisition proceedings under the J&K Land Acquisition Act.

Headnote:

(A) J&K Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 6, 7, and 11-B - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Petitioners challenged notifications regarding land acquisition, asserting that proceedings lapsed due to failure to issue a final award within two years - Court found that the acquisition proceedings had indeed lapsed as no award was made within the stipulated period. (Paras 1-9)

(B) Land Acquisition Proceedings - The Collector must issue an award within two years of declaration; failure to do so results in lapse of proceedings - The court emphasized that the specific circumstances of each case must be considered when applying legal precedents. (Paras 6-8)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners owned land proposed for acquisition for road construction, but final award was not issued within two years of the declaration.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the notifications and acquisition proceedings were quashed due to the lapse of time, directing fresh proceedings under the Act of 2013.

Issues: Whether the land acquisition proceedings lapsed due to the failure to issue a final award within the statutory period.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the failure to issue a final award within two years results in the lapse of acquisition proceedings, distinguishing the current case from cited precedents.

Result: Petition allowed.

ORDER

ORAL

1. The petitioners, through the medium of present petition, have challenged notification No. SDM/TD/578-582/15 dated 18.06.2015 under Section 4(1) of J&K Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter to be referred as the ‘State Act’) issued by respondent No. 4 in respect of land measuring 6 Kanal 6 Marlas comprised in Khasra No. 1216-44 and 1028/44 situated at Village Thuroo, Tehsil Thuroo, District Reasi. Challenge has also been thrown to notification No. 82-Rev(LAJ) of 2017 dated 23.02.2017 issued by respondent No. 1 under Section 6 of the State Land Acquisition Act in respect of the aforesaid land. Further the petitioners have sought a direction upon the respondents to initiate fresh acquisition proceedings in respect of the land in question in terms of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act , 2013 (hereinafter to be referred as Act of 2013) and to pay compensation to them.

2. According to the petitioners they are owners of the aforesaid land and in the year 2008 a Degree College was sanctioned at Dharmari which is about 50 Km away from Reasi. 167 Kanals of land was acquired by the Government for construction of the College and the process of construction was started in the year 2015. It has been submitted that there was no connecting road to the construction site, as a result of which, land of the petitioners was proposed to be acquired by the respondents. Impugned notification dated 18.06.2015 under Section 4(1) of the State Land Acquisition Act came to be issued by the Collector, whereafter impugned declaration under Section 6 of the State Act came to be issued by the Government. It has been submitted that pursuant to issuance of notice of declaration under Section 6 of the State Land Acquisition Act, no action was taken by the respondents to conclude the acquisition proceedings and the final award was not passed by the Collector within the stipulated period of two years of issuance of declaration under Section 6 of the State Land Acquisition Act. On these grounds, it is being contended that the land acquisition proceedings have lapsed and the respondents have to initiate fresh acquisition proceedings in terms of Act of 2013.

3. Respondent No. 4-Collector has filed his reply to the writ petition, wherein he has admitted that the land of the petitioners has been utilized for construction of road. However, it has been submitted that after issuance of declaration under Section 6 and 7 of the State Land Acquisition Act, notice under Section 9 and 9-A of the State Land Acquisition Act came to be issued vide No. SDM/208-14/17 dated 12.05.2017, whereby land owners and interested persons as well as indenting department were invited for filing objections with regard to measurement of land, title of the property and quantum of compensation proposed. It has been further submitted that vide No. SDM/312/17 dated 08.08.2017 draft award was issued by the Collector. Respondent No. 4 has admitted that the final award could not be issued due to non-availability of the requisite funds. Thus, disbursement of compensation in favour of the land owners could not take place. Respondent No. 4 has further contended that in view of ratio laid down by Supreme Court in case titled as Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL) and others vs. Nisar Ahmed Ganai and others ( Civil Appeal Nos. 6781-6783 of 2022 ), acquisition proceedings would not lapse and that the respondents can take forward the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land in question under the State Land Acquisition Act.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused record of the case.

5. So far as the factual aspects of the matter are concerned, the same are not in dispute. Notification under Section 4 (1) of the State Land Acquisition Act in respect of the land belonging to the petitioner came to be issued on 18.06.2015 and the declaration under Section 6 and 7 of the State Land Acquisition Act came to be issued by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top