SANJEEV KUMAR, RAHUL BHARTI
Satpal Gupta S/o Shri Amar Nath Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJEEV KUMAR, J.
1. This intra-Court Appeal filed by the appellant [‘the writ petitioner’] under clause 12 of the Letters Patent is directed against judgment 08.11.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court [‘the Writ Court’] in OWP No. 697/2012 titled Satpal Gupta vs. State and Others.
2. Before we advert to the grounds of challenge urged by learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, appellant herein, we deem it appropriate to give brief resume of the factual antecedents leading to filing of this appeal.
3. Land measuring 125 kanals, 13 marlas situate in village Narwal Bala, Tehsil and District Jammu was acquired by the respondents for public purpose, namely construction of 2nd Grid Station. A requisition was made by the Chief Executive Officer, JDA vide his Communication No. JDA/DDM/Mic.82/141.42 dated 04.05.1977. The Collector Land Acquisition (PWD) Jammu issued a notification under section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act Svt.1990 [‘the Act’] on 24.05.1977 which was published in the Government Gazette on 09.06.1977. Since no objections to the acquisition of the land under Section 5-A of the Act were received from the interested persons, a declaration
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the acquisition proceedings had lapsed in view of the proviso appended to Section 11-B of the Act, and the respondents were directed to initia....
Final award beyond two-year limit from Section 6 declaration under J&K Land Acquisition Act lapses proceedings; court moulds relief by quashing award qua petitioners only and directing fresh award us....
The mandatory nature of Section 11-B of the Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, 1990, and the consequences of failing to make the award within the prescribed time period.
The court established that the failure to comply with the procedural requirements of the J&K Land Acquisition Act, particularly regarding the timely passing of awards and the payment of compensation,....
The provisions of Section 11-B of the 1990 Act shall not be applicable to the cases where the Government has invoked Section 17 and the Collector has scrupulously complied with the requirements of Se....
Once possession is taken and an award is passed, challenges to land acquisition proceedings are not maintainable, and remedies for compensation must be sought through reference proceedings.
The court affirmed that land acquisition proceedings were valid and not lapsed under section 11-B, directing compensation payment as per the award.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the acquisition proceedings lapsed as no award was made within 2 years of the declaration under Section 6 of the 1894 Act, and the State was d....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.