ORDER :

Heard Mr. Kumar Nilesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. Bandana Bharti, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. This revision petition has been filed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 31.01.2005 passed by 1st Class Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in G.R. Case No.3263 of 2000, corresponding to T.R. No.319 of 2005, arising out of Putki P.S. Case No.124 of 2000.

3. The petitioner has been convicted to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months for offence under Sections 354 of IPC and to undergo simple imprisonment for one month for offence under Section 341 of the IPC.

4. Petitioner has also challenged the order of learned Sessions Judge, Dhanbad dated 8.05.2009 passed in Cr. Appeal No.36 of 2005 confirming the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 341/354 of Indian Penal Code. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

Arguments of the petitioner

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that there are concurrent findings recorded by the learned courts below and accordingly he is confining his arguments on the point of sentence. Learned counsel submitted that th