IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, JJ.
The Union of India - Appellant
Versus
Priyabrat Singh, son of Late Mahadeo Singh – Respondent
W.P.(S) No.6050 of 2019
Decided on : 14-09-2022
CPF - Conversion from CPF to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme - DOPT letter dated 01.05.1987 - 04.01.1987 - 01.09.1988 - 1521 dated 08.10.2015
Fact of the Case:
The original applicant, a KVS employee, sought conversion from CPF to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme based on DOPT letters. KVS refused citing the option offered in 1988. The Tribunal allowed the application, leading to the writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the employee's lack of specific option did not warrant conversion to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme, citing relevant documents and judgments.
Issues: The main issue was whether the employee should be converted from CPF to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme based on DOPT letters and the 1988 option.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of a specific option, the employee cannot be deemed to have opted for GPF-cum-Pension Scheme, as per relevant documents and legal precedents.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the Tribunal's decision and denying the conversion from CPF to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme.
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
The instant writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the order dated 19th September, 2019 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna (Circuit Bench at Ranchi) in O.A. No.051/00132/2019 has been questioned by which the order as contained in letter No.1521 dated 08.10.2015 has been quashed and set aside holding it contrary to the decision of the Department of Personnel and Training as contained in DOPT No.4/1/87 dated 01.05.1987 issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pensions, Government of India wherein it has categorically been mentioned that all CPF beneficiaries, who were in service on 01.01.1986 and who were still in service on the date of issue of these orders would be deemed to have come over to the Pension Scheme.
2. The brief facts of the case, as per the pleadings, which are required to be enumerated herein, read as under :-
The original applicant-respondent claims to be working as PGT Chemistry in Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS), Hinoo, Doranda, Ranchi after having joined the service sometime in the year 1980 and was allotted CPF No.2932. The original applicant-respondent made a representation before the concerned competent authority seeking conversion from CPF to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme in view of the DOPT letter dated 04.01.1987/01.05.1987 issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Government of India whereby it has categorically been mentioned that all CPF beneficiaries, who were in service on 01.01.1986 and who are still in service on the date of issue of these orders, would be deemed to have come over to the pension scheme. It is the case of the original applicant-respondent that the KVS has arbitrarily recommended the case for conversion of CPF to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme for direct recruits, who joined Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan between 01.01.1986 to 31.12.2003, leaving behind the direct recruits like the present applicant who have joined the service prior to 01.01.1986. The aforesaid action of the concerned authorities is without any proper justification for choosing specific time frame.
It is the case of the original applicant-respondent that the KVS is an autonomous body fully financed by the Central Government, Ministry of Human Resources Department and Central Government Rules are applicable to it, like CCS-CCA, Fundamental Rules, General Fundamental Rules, LTC Rules, etc. which are at par with the Central Government Employees and, as such, the KVS decided to implement the decision taken by the Government of India on the basis of the recommendations of 4th Central Pay Commission for KVS employees for change of CPF to Pension Scheme in the manner indicated in DOPT letter dated 01.05.1987.
The grievance of the respondent is that the KVS acted completely against the objectives of the DOPT letter dated 01.05.1987 by taking the ground that the option was offered to switch over from CPF to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme vide letter dated 01.09.1988 but this letter was not the option for the pension Scheme, rather it was for continuation of CPF and no circular was shown/given to the employees including the present respondent, which is against the rules of natural justice.
It is the case of the respondent that there was provision in the DOPT letter dated 01.05.1987 that if option of CPF was not exercised, then automatically, such employees would be deemed to have come to Pension Scheme. Thus, it is a clear cut case of concealment of facts from the employees and this way the employees were deprived their last opportunity to continue in CPF Scheme in a planned manner, by the KVS by acting against the main objectives of DOPT letter dated 01.05.1987.
On the other hand, the case of the writ petitioners is that the KVS is an autonomous organization registered under the Societies Registration Act XXI of 1960 and fully financed by the Ministry of HRD, Government of India with the object to develop the Vidya
KVS and Others v. Jaspal Kaur and Others [(2007) 6 SCC 13]
In the absence of a specific option, an employee cannot be deemed to have opted for a different pension scheme, as per relevant documents and legal precedents.
Circumstantial evidence of CPF account, deductions, and acceptance without protest proves option retention despite no original form; acquiescence bars switch to pension scheme post-retirement.
Employee opting for CPF can switch to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme post-cut-off on parity grounds, as pension is beneficial welfare measure; limitation, delay not bars despite superannuation.
Employee opting for CPF can switch to GPF-Pension post-retirement on parity grounds despite 'irrevocable' option; denial discriminatory if others similarly situated benefited; limitation no bar for w....
Employees cannot switch pension schemes post-retirement if their historical choices contradict current claims, and procedural lapses invalidate their appeals.
The legal fiction created by the Office Memorandum automatically migrated existing employees to the GPF scheme, and the burden was on the employee to exercise the option to remain under the CPF schem....
Employees must exercise timely options under service schemes; belated attempts to claim benefits not sustainable due to principles of delay and laches.
The court affirmed that employees must timely exercise options for scheme conversion; delay undermines claims, reinforcing the doctrine of laches.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.