SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, SUBHASH CHAND
Shyam Sundar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The instant appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the order/judgment dated 18.12.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No. 1940 of 2014, whereby and whereunder, the writ petition has been dismissed by declining to interfere with the decision of the Government as contained in Memo No. 2394 dated 11.09.2013 issued under the signature of respondent no.2 by which the implementation of Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme (in short DACP) w.e.f. 05.04.2002 and 29.10.2008 as per the 5th Pay Revision recommendation and 6th Pay Revision recommendation respectively has been shifted to 01.09.2008, as also prayer for quashing of the notification contained in Memo Nos. 51(3) and 52(3) both dated 15.01.2014 by which the benefit granted in favour of the writ petitioner under DACP have been withdrawn.
2. The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in the writ petition, which require to be enumerated
Census Commr. v. R. Krishnamurthy [Census Commr. v. R. Krishnamurthy
Directorate of Film Festivals and Ors. vs. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and Ors.
Dr. Subramanian Swamy vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr.
MGB Gramin Bank Vs. Chakrawarti Singh [(2014) 13 SCC 583]
Parisons Agrotech Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
R. v. Gaming Board ex. p. Benaim [(1970) 2 QB 417 : (1970) 2 All ER 528]
State of U.P. and Ors. vs. J.P. Chaurasia & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.