SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 1159

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, RATNAKER BHENGRA, JJ.
M/s APCO INFRATECH Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M/s MECON Ltd. – Respondent
Commercial Appeal No. 23 of 2019
Decided On : 05-09-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Nitin Kumar Pasari, Sidhi Jalan.
For the Respondent: Manish Mishra.

Headnote:(A) Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Section 13(1-A) - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34(2)(a)(v) - SETTING ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARD - The Commercial Court set aside an arbitral award on grounds of improper tribunal composition. The award favored the claimant due to arbitrary deduction of liquidated damages without basis. (Paras 1, 12, 21).

(B) Jurisdiction - The Commercial Court lacked jurisdiction as the arbitration proceedings adhered to agreed rules and all requisite notices were served.

(C) Limitation - The cause of action for the claimant arose upon notification of the liquidated damages, and invocation of arbitration was timely, as clarified in section 21. (Paras 11, 20, 24).

(D) Final Decision - The appeal was allowed, confirming the arbitral award and underscoring the sanctity of arbitration and limits on judicial interference. (Paras 36, 37).

Facts of the case:
Dispute arose after the MECON withheld a balance payment due to APCO, claiming liquidated damages years after contract completion, leading to arbitration proceedings initiated by APCO.

Findings of Court:
The arbitral tribunal's award was upheld, emphasizing MECON's improper adjustment of dues against late completion claims, thus validating the ruling in favor of APCO.

Issues: Whether the composition of the arbitral tribunal was correct, and whether the adjustments for liquidated damages were warranted per the contract.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the arbitral tribunal's composition and process complied with the contract stipulations, dismissing MECON's objections on procedural grounds.

Result: The arbitral award was restored and the Commercial Court's decision was set aside.

Table of Content
1. contractual completion timelines and payments. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 7)
2. late payments and requests for dues. (Para 6 , 10)
3. arbitral tribunal decisions on claims and liquidated damages. (Para 8 , 11)
4. challenging arbitration awards. (Para 12 , 13)
5. restoration of arbitral awards. (Para 36 , 37)

JUDGMENT :

SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, J.

1. M/s APCO INFRATECH Ltd. [in short APCO] has filed this Commercial Appeal under section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act , 2015 against the judgment dated 30th May 2019 passed by the Presiding Officer of the Commercial Court at Ranchi in Commercial (REVOC) Case No. 117 of 2015. The Commercial Court has set aside the arbitral Award dated 15th May 2015 on the ground that the composition of the arbitral Tribunal was not as per the agreement of the parties and, therefore, the arbitral Award was liable to be set aside under section 34 (2) (a) (v) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [in short AC Act].

2. Briefly stated, the Indian Oil Corporation Limited [in short IOCL] awarded the work for “Civil Works for Pipeline Tank Terminal at Amousi near Lucknow” [in short the Project] in the State of Uttar Pradesh to M/s MECON Limited [in short, MECON] and in turn, the MECON invited bids in two parts for executing the Project captioned as Civil Works (Package-I) and Civil Works (Package-II) and both works were awarded to the APCO vide LOIs dated 15th March 2001 and 11th June 2001. The total value of the subject works was Rs. 3,55,87,269/- for Package-I and Rs. 4,55,37,886/- for Package-II and the Project was to be completed within 8 months. The Work Order dated 11th March 2001 enclosed the schedule of rates and various other taxes described in Attachment-2 wherein it was provided that (i) the schedule of rates and the total contract price shall remain firm throughout the contract period, (ii) no variation in the schedule of rates on any account is permissible and (iii) the unit rates are inclusive of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Octroi duty, if applicable, and all applicable taxes, duties and levies. The schedule of rates provided that the contract price shall include and cover the cost of materials, labor, tools and tackles, construction equipment, templates, scaffoldings, transportation, power and water, and shall also include the cost of insurance covering 3rd party liability, loss of human life and risk of damages on other material/equipment. The agreed terms of payment were provided in Attachment-3 which contained a condition that “the payment shall be released only on receipt of the corresponding payment from IOCL” which is the Principal employer for the Project.

3. The Work Order dated 15th March 2001 which contained the aforesaid conditions for payment under clause 4.0 is extracted below:

    MECON LIMITED

    (A Government of India Enterprise)

    Dated: 15.03.2001

    WORK ORDER

    M/s APCO Constructions (P) Ltd.

    3/14, Viswas Khand,

    Gomati Nagar,

    Lucknow-226010

    Uttar Pradesh

    Fax No. 0522-308153

Works Order No.

Date of LOI/Order

Date of Completion

Contractor's Code

MEC/2323/43/WO/001

15.01.2001/15.03.2001

14.09.2001

    Dear Sirs,

    Subject: Works Order for Civil Works (Package-I) required for Pipeline Tank Terminal at Amousi Near Lucknow, in the State of Uttar Pradesh.

    Ref:

    1. Our Works Tender Enquiry No. MEC/S/2323/11/11/WC/001 dated 19.12.2000

    2. Your Offer No. APCO/2001/MECON/1388 dated 30.12.2000

    3. List of enclosed documents and correspondence-Attachment-I

    4. Our LOI/FAX Order No. 43/33/2323/02/1515 dated 15.01.2001

    With reference to above, we MECON LIMITED, are pleased to place this work order on you for the subject jobs for a value of Rs. 3,55,87,269/- (Rupees Three crore fifty five lakhs eighty seven thousand two hundred sixty nine only) as per the terms and conditions of the documents forming the part of this works order for execution of the subject job at Pipeline Tank Terminal of IOCL

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top