Back
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Central Coalfields Ltd, through its General Manager (Legal) Sri Partha Bhattacharjee, son of Late P. C. Bhattacharjee – Appellant
Versus
Sunita Kumari, D/o. Late Mahabir Munda – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The instant intra-court appeal, under Clause-10 of Letters Patent, is directed against the order/judgment dated 02.05.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (S) No. 4141 of 2019 whereby and whereunder, the writ petition has been allowed setting aside the impugned order dated 29.06.2019 and directed the Central Coalfields Limited to re-visit their own order and pass an order regarding payment of monetary compensation as per her entitlement to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.
I.A. No.1631 of 2023
2. The instant appeal is barred by delay of 133 days, therefore, the instant Interlocutory Applications has been filed for condoning the aforesaid delay.
3. Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel appearing for the appellant-CCL has advanced his argument on the issue of merit.
4. Mr. P.P.N. Roy, learned senior counsel, appearing for the respondent, has submitted that the appeal is barred by limitation of 133 days and in consequence thereof an application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the said delay.
5. The notice has also been issued by th
The principle that the law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and that bureaucratic delays do not constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay in filing appeals.
The principle that the law of limitation must be strictly applied, and that any request for condonation of delay must be supported by a sufficient and reasonable explanation, which was not met in thi....
The principle that the law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and that bureaucratic delays do not constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay in filing appeals.
The court emphasized that delay in filing appeals must be strictly justified, and lack of bona fides or negligence can prevent condonation of delay.
The court emphasized that delay in filing appeals must be condoned only when sufficient cause is shown, with strict adherence to the law of limitation.
The principle that the law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and that a party seeking condonation of delay must provide a satisfactory explanation that demonstrates diligence and bona fides.
The principle that the law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and that a party seeking condonation of delay must provide a satisfactory and bona fide explanation for the delay, is fundamental....
The law of limitation must be applied strictly, and delay in filing appeals can only be condoned on sufficient cause, which was not established in this case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
