SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 531

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
Madhusudan Mahto – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent
W.P. (S) No.5543 of 2019
Decided on : 21-03-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S. N. Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Faisal Allam, A.C. to S.C. (Mines)-III, Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
The absence of earmarked posts for a specific disability category negates any claim for appointment under the physically handicapped quota.

Headnote:

(A) Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Section 33 - Writ petition for appointment as Trained Graduate Teacher under physically handicapped quota - Petitioner not considered due to lack of earmarked posts for Cerebral Palsy - Court finds no legal basis for the claim as no vacancy existed for the category. (Paras 1-19)

(B) Reservation - Horizontal reservation for physically handicapped candidates - No posts available for locomotor disability or Cerebral Palsy in the subject advertised - Petitioner's merit lower than last selected candidate under EBC-1 category. (Paras 7, 13, 17)

Facts of the case:

The petitioner sought appointment as a Trained Graduate Teacher under the physically handicapped quota but was not considered due to the absence of earmarked posts for his category in the relevant advertisement.

Findings of Court:

The court upheld the respondent's position that no posts were available for the petitioner's category, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to appointment under the physically handicapped quota when no posts were reserved for his category.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the absence of earmarked posts for the petitioner's category negated any claim for appointment under the physically handicapped quota, affirming the legality of the respondent's actions.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

1. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondents to issue appointment letter to the petitioner for the post of Trained Graduate Teacher in the subject “Panchpargania” for Ranchi district under physically handicapped quota with respect to Combined Graduate Trained Teacher Competitive Examination- 2016 conducted by the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission pursuant to Advertisement no.21 of 2016.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved with non-consideration of his candidature by the respondent-Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC) under physically handicapped quota, infringing such right guaranteed under law.

3. Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-JSSC argues that the petitioner submitted his online application before the JSSC for consideration of his candidature for appointment on the post of Trained Graduate Teacher for the subject “Panchpargania” for Ranchi district under EBC-1 category. He also claimed the benefit of reservation under physically handicapped quota (cerebral palsy), as would be evident from the copy of his online application, annexed as Annexure-B to the counter affidavit.

4. It is further submitted that Advertisement no.21 of 2016 was published in terms with the requisition of the Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand for appointment of Trained Graduate Teacher in several subjects in scheduled and nonscheduled districts. Ranchi is under scheduled district, as would be evident from the relevant Clause of the said advertisement.

5. It is further submitted that at the time of issuance of the said advertisement, the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 was in force. In terms with Section 33 of the said Act, the Government has to appoint in every establishment such percentage of vacancies not less than three percent for persons or class of persons with disability of which one percent each shall be reserved for persons suffering from;

(i) Blindness or low vision;

(ii) Hearing impairment; and

(iii) Locomotor Disability or Cerebral Palsy.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent-JSSC further submits that the State Government vide circular dated 7th November, 2007 also fixed roster point for extending the benefit of reservation to physically handicapped candidates on horizontal basis in the following manner:-

(i) Blindness or low vision

1 to 33

(ii) Hearing impairment

33 to 67

(iii) Locomotor Disability or Cerebral Palsy

68 to 100

7. It is also submitted that in the said advertisement, for the subject “Panchpargania” under Ranchi district, one post each was earmarked for physically handicapped quota under blindness/low vision i.e. one post for direct recruitment candidates and one post for the candidates under Primary Teacher category and no post was earmarked for the candidates suffering from Locomotor Disability or Cerebral Palsy. Out of seven posts which were advertised for the subject “Panchpargania” for Ranchi district under direct recruitment, only one post was reserved for EBC-1 category, as would be evident from Clause 2 of the said advertisement. There were two posts advertised for Saraikella-Kharsawan district under direct recruitment for the subject “Panchpargania” i.e. one post each for unreserved category and scheduled tribe category, out of which one post was reserved for physically handicapped quota under blindness/low vision. No post was advertised under physically handicapped quota for the candidates suffering from Locomotor disability or Cerebral Palsy in the subject “Panchpargania” for Ranchi district. Therefore, the benefit of horizontal reservation under physically handicapped quota (Cerebral Palsy) under EBC-1 for the subject “Panchpargania” was not extended to the petitioner.

8. It is further submitted that in district-wise

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top