Back
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited – Appellant
Versus
Anvil Cables Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
I.A. No. 5511 of 2024:
1 Civil Review No. 71 of 2024
1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed for condonation of delay of 21 days which has occurred in filing the instant civil review.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the delay of 21 days which has occurred in filing the instant civil review may be condoned.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent has raised no objection to such submission of the learned counsel for the appellant in condoning the delay.
4. Considering the reason assigned in the delay condonation application, this Court is of the view that the delay of 21 days may be condoned.
5. Accordingly, the instant interlocutory application is allowed and the delay of 21 days which has occurred in filing the instant civil review, is hereby condoned.
Civil Review No. 71 of 2024:
6. The instant civil review has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for modification of the order dated 08.04.2024 passed in W.P.(T) No. 5475 of 2023.
7. Before proceeding to examine the principle of review as to whether the same is applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case or not, it needs to refer herein the factual backgr
Review petitions are limited to errors apparent on the record and cannot serve as an appeal to reargue previously decided matters.
The court affirmed that unjust retention of funds violates fundamental principles of justice, and review jurisdiction is limited to specific grounds, not allowing for re-argument of previously decide....
Review jurisdiction is not an appeal; it addresses only material errors apparent on record, not new arguments or hearsay.
(1) Condonation of Delay and bona fide Prosecution – A delay of 455 days in filing the Review Application was condoned because the applicant was actively pursuing the claim through an Execution Appli....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the review process cannot be used to re-open settled issues or seek re-hearing of the original petition. It also emphasizes the limited scope ....
The power of review is limited to correcting apparent errors on the record and cannot be used to rehash arguments or findings that have been previously settled.
The court ruled that a party cannot justify an inordinate delay in filing a review petition based on subsequent overruling of a prior decision, as it violates the principles of limitation and suffici....
Delay in review petition condoned under Section 14 Limitation Act, excluding time in bona fide Letters Patent Appeal against Article 227 order dismissed for non-maintainability. Review dismissed for ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
