Back
A. P. SAHI, BHARATKUMAR PANDYA
Indian Acrylics Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Company Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
IA/6260/2025
This Application has been moved praying for condoning the entire delay in the filing of the Review Application. The background is that on 16.01.2024, First Appeal No. 87 of 2016 that has given rise to this Review Application was allowed with a direction for payment of Rs.64,24,404/- to the Appellants alongwith interest @ 6% per annum and litigation cost of Rs.50,000/-. In the event of default of payment within the time prescribed the rate of interest would stand enhanced to 9%. The Insurance Company complied with the Order and made the payments but the interest was paid only from the date of the order of this Commission i.e. 16.01.2024.
2. The Appellant filed an Execution Application No. 230 of 2024 contending that the interest should be paid from the date of the filing of the Complaint but the Insurance Company in its reply to the Execution Application contested the matter urging that the interest has only been awarded from the date of the order and not from the date of the filing of the original Complaint. The Bench hearing the Execution Application therefore made an enquiry as to whether any review has been sought or not.
3. The explanation given in Paragraph
(1) Condonation of Delay and bona fide Prosecution – A delay of 455 days in filing the Review Application was condoned because the applicant was actively pursuing the claim through an Execution Appli....
The judgment clarified compensation assessment principles in insurance claims, including salvage deductions and interest for delays.
Review petitions are limited to errors apparent on the record and cannot serve as an appeal to reargue previously decided matters.
(1) The Surveyor’s Report Threshold: Once a surveyor submits a final report and the insurer accepts it, any further delay in disbursing the funds constitutes a deficiency. The insurer cannot hold ont....
The court retains discretion to impose interest on delayed compensation payments despite extensions granted, reinforcing that terms of prior orders remain in force unless explicitly waived.
Limitation – Condonation of delay – Term “sufficient cause” u/Section 5 of Limitation Act should be liberally construed promote substantial justice, when delays are not due to dilatory tactics, bad f....
The court ruled that a party cannot justify an inordinate delay in filing a review petition based on subsequent overruling of a prior decision, as it violates the principles of limitation and suffici....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a liberal, pragmatic, justice-oriented approach in dealing with applications for condonation of delay, while also emphasizing t....
Review jurisdiction is not an appeal; it addresses only material errors apparent on record, not new arguments or hearsay.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
