DEEPAK ROSHAN
Rahul Kumar, S/o. Onkar Malviya – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Labour and Employment, Training and Skill Development – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Deepak Roshan, J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing and setting aside the notification as contained in memo No.108 dated 24.01.2024 (Annexure-11); whereby a punishment has been imposed upon the petitioner for withholding of three increments without cumulative effect, when the fact remains that for the very same set of allegations as alleged in the departmental proceeding, the petitioner has been honourably acquitted in the criminal case.
The petitioner has further prayed for a direction upon the respondents to include and consider the name of the petitioner, the senior most in the cadre, for the purpose of promotion into the rank of Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories.
It has further been prayed for quashing of the Notification dated 05.01.2024 (Annexure-13); whereby the respondent No.4, a junior officer than the petitioner, has been made In-charge on the post of Chief Inspector of Factories, Jharkhand.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed at the post of Inspector of Factories Class-II Gazetted under Jharkhand Labour Service Technical Cadre in
Union of India vs. B.V. Gopinath reported in (2014) 1 SCC 351
State Bank of India and Ors. V. Narendra Kumar Pandey reported in (2013) 2 SCC 740
Union of India v. Sardar Bahadur (1972) 4 SCC 618
R.S. Saini v. State of Punjab (1999) 8 SCC 90 : 1999 SCC (L&S) 1424
Roop Singh Negi V. Punjab National Bank reported in (2009) 2 SCC 570
G.M. Tank V. State of Gujarat reported in (2006) 5 SCC 446
State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. V. Saroj Kumar Sinha reported in (2010) 2 SCC 772
Union of India V. K.V. Jankiraman reported in (1991) 4 SCC 109
Departmental proceedings must adhere to principles of natural justice, and acquittal in criminal cases does not preclude disciplinary action but requires proper evidence examination.
The court ruled that failure to provide inquiry reports and examine witnesses violates natural justice, rendering disciplinary actions arbitrary and illegal.
Disciplinary proceedings against a public servant must cease if the charges are identical to those leading to an honourable acquittal in a criminal case, ensuring fairness in due process.
The absence of Presenting Officers in disciplinary proceedings violates natural justice, necessitating the setting aside of dismissal orders and reinstatement of affected personnel.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.