Back
ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
L. H. Sugar Factories Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Asstt. Provident Fund Commissioner Bareilly – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.
Heard Sri Ravi Kant, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Arpit Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner. No one has put in appearance on behalf of respondent though names of three advocates have been shown in the cause list.
2. This writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 26.04.1999 passed by Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Sub-Regional Office, Bareilly in proceedings under section 7A of The Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter called as 'Act of 1952').
3. It is contended by learned Senior Counsel that the earlier round of proceedings which was in respect of the same period was decided by order of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner on 24.01.1995 and it was found that established had engaged persons as trainees and not employees. The establishment was found not liable to pay provident dues. Subsequently, it appears that on a complaint proceedings were again launched for the same period. By order impugned dated 26.04.1999, the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Incharge Sub-Region, Bareilly had ordered for the payment of Rs.20,88,095/- as dues for the period November, 1992 to
The authority must consider jurisdictional issues and provide specific findings on employee count and applicability of the Act when assessing provident fund dues.
The court emphasized that review applications under the Act must afford an opportunity for hearing to the aggrieved party, reinforcing principles of natural justice.
An appeal under the Employees' Provident Fund Act is premature if there is no determination of dues, as required by Section 7A.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the violation of principles of natural justice in the decision-making process and the entitlement of the petitioner to a fresh consideration of the....
Review Application - Provisions of section 7-B of Act specifically provides for review and same will have to be decided after issuing notice to review petitioner and all concerned parties and obvious....
Procedural fairness demands that parties are heard and any timely contributions considered before imposing damages and interest under the Employees' Provident Fund Act.
The importance of considering evidence and applying the provisions of the Act properly in reaching a decision.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner to decide the entitlement of an employee to become a member and the date from which the e....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
