IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR, J
Naresh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
I.A. No.10067 of 2018:
1. The present interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for staying the operation of the order dated 28th July, 2018 passed by the Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka in R.M.A. No.178 of 2016-17.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present interlocutory application was filed in the year 2018 and he does not want to press the same at this belated stage. However, the petitioners may be given liberty to file fresh application seeking interim relief, if any such situation arises.
3. Considering the aforesaid submission, the present interlocutory application is dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty.
I.A. No.9972 of 2024:
4. The present interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of applicants-Dropadi Devi and Bipin Kumar Singh @ Pappu Singh for acceptance of Vakalatnama filed on their behalf.
5. Considering that the said applicants have already been arrayed as respondent nos.2(a) and 3 respectively in the present writ petition, the Vakalatnama on their behalf is ordered to be accepted.
6. I.A. No.9972 of 2024 stands disposed of.
I.A. No.1498 of 2025:
7. The present interlo
Legal heirs have the right to intervene in ongoing proceedings to ensure proper representation.
Legal representatives must be substituted in ongoing proceedings upon the death of a party to ensure proper continuation of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.