Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Dr. Justice S. N. Pathak, J
Suman Oraon S/o Jugeshwar Oraon @ Dayal Oraon – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Jharkhand. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. N. PATHAK, J.
I.A. No. 8048 of 2024
1. The instant Interlocutory Application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
2. Learned counsel for the Opp. Party Mr. Prabir Kumar Chatterjee opposes the contention of the petitioner and submits that delay of 66 days is there which remains un-explained.
3. However, the Court is fully satisfied with the cause shown. Therefore, limitation of 66 days is hereby condoned.
4. Interlocutory Application No. 8048 of 2024 stands allowed.
I.A. No. 11645 of 2024
5. The instant Interlocutory Application has been filed for exemption from surrender.
6. Since the petitioners have already surrendered, this Interlocutory Application has become infructuous.
7. Accordingly, I.A. No. 11645 of 2024 stands dismissed as infructuous.
I.A. No. 78 of 2025
8. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this interlocutory application, which has been filed for grant of bail during the pendency of the Cr. Revision Petition.
9. This interlocutory application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Cr. Rev. No. 1177 of 2024
10. This criminal revision application has been filed against the judgment dated 05.02.2024 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 15 of 2023
First-time offenders may have their sentences modified to time served, considering the nature of the offence and prior custody.
The court condoned a significant delay in filing a revision application and granted bail based on the petitioner's lengthy custody and the circumstances of the case.
The court condoned a 588-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision under the Limitation Act due to the petitioner's custody and financial constraints, emphasizing leniency in such circumstances.
The court condoned a 182-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision due to compromise and allowed the substitution of legal heirs following the death of a party, emphasizing leniency in procedural matte....
Delay in filing appeals may be excused under the Limitation Act when supported by justifiable reasons, and prolonged custody may warrant bail during pending revisions.
The court emphasized that sufficient cause for delay in filing a revision petition must not involve negligence, and reiterated that revisional jurisdiction cannot be exercised for matters already adj....
The court condoned a 212-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision Application based on the petitioner's financial hardship and ignorance of prior judgments, granting provisional bail during the appeal....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
