Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN
Vandi Industrial Engineers – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interlinked writs challenging certificate cancellation heard together. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner alleges arbitrary revocation ignoring replies. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. no factual probe in writ; certificate expired; no deemed approval. (Para 13 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 4. state revokes for false information and entity misrepresentation. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. violations of certificate clauses confirmed via show causes. (Para 21 , 22 , 27) |
| 6. competency certificates governed by factories act rules. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 28) |
| 7. petitions dismissed; contempt infructuous. (Para 33 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. W.P.(C) No. 36 of 2021 was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs: -
I. For quashing the impugned letter no. JH/CIF/7/Com. 1046/2015 dated 14.08.2020 issued under the signature of Respondent No. 4, whereby and whereunder the Competency Certificate No. JH/CIF/7/Com.1046/2015 dated 03.02.2020 of the Petitioner has been cancelled/revoked.
II. Consequently, for direction upon the respondents to restore the Competency Certificate of the petitioner.
3.
Writ courts under Article 226 cannot resolve factual disputes on competency certificate revocations for condition violations or misrepresentations; expired certificates not restorable; deemed approva....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a claim based on a certificate issued at a later date, without a genuine mistake, does not qualify for additional marks. The court emphasized ....
Employment termination due to fraudulent certification requires strict adherence to prescribed regulations, prioritizing lawful procedures even post long service. Fraud undermines legitimacy, mandati....
Point of law: Community Certificate produced by the petitioner itself had been declared as not genuine by the competent District Level Vigilance Committee. In the light of the above, the present cont....
The court held that the U.P. Pollution Control Board exceeded its authority in revoking the consent to operate without evidence of non-compliance, affirming that prior approvals remained valid.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
