ANITA SUMANTH
Gurusamy – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman, Review Committee on POTA – Respondent
ORDER :
1. There are 28 petitioners in these four Writ Petitions. The petitioners in two of the Writ Petitions (W.P. Nos. 38873 of 2005 and 5386 of 2006), challenge an order passed by the Review Committee constituted in terms of Section 60(4) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (in short ‘POTA Act’).
2. The petitioner in W.P. No. 1377 of 2016 seeks a writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for order dated 23.05.2016 on the file of the respondent herein and quash of the same as illegal and a direction to the respondent to constitute a review committee to review the case of the petitioner.
3. The petitioner in W.P. No. 36989 of 2016 seeks a mandamus directing the State to constitute a Review committee to consider whether there is a prima facie case for continuance of the matters pending before the POTA Special Court as against her.
Submissions of the Petitioner
4. The genesis of the impugned proceedings is an incident that took place on 23.11.2002 when, on information received from a police constable, a team of police officials headed by the Inspector of Police, Naxalite Special
Arup Bhuyan vs. State of Assam
Abdul Rehman Antulay and Others vs. R.S. Nayak and Another
D.K. Basu vs. State of West Bengal
Kartar Singh vs. State of Punjab
Mahmadhusen Abdulrahim Kalota Shaikh vs. Union of India and Others
Mohd. Iqbal M. Shaikh and Others vs. State of Maharashtra
Noor Aga vs. State of Punjab and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.