IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. MAHADEVAN, MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, JJ.
K. Vaithilingam – Appellants
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu & Others – Respondents
W.A. No. 538 of 2023
Decided on : 11-03-2024
G.O.Ms.No.216 - Secondary Grade Teachers - The court directed the respondent authorities to consider the claim of the appellant seeking special grade in the post of Primary School Headmaster, by extending the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.216 School Education Department, dated 22.03.1993, in the light of the earlier orders.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, a Secondary Grade Teacher, sought special grade in the post of Primary School Headmaster based on G.O.Ms.No.216, which was dismissed by the learned Judge.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the respondent authorities to consider the claim of the appellant and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks, without going into the merits of the case.
Issues: The issue was whether the appellant, as a Secondary Grade Teacher, is entitled to the special grade in the post of Primary School Headmaster under G.O.Ms.No.216.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the limited nature of the relief sought by the appellant and directed the respondent authorities to consider the claim purely on merits and in accordance with law.
Final Decision: The writ appeal was disposed of with the direction to the respondent authorities to consider the appellant's claim within eight weeks.
JUDGMENT :
R. Mahadevan, J.
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order dated 18.11.2013 made in W.P.No.20304 of 2013 passed by this Court.)
1. The appellant herein is the seventh petitioner in a writ petition bearing No. 20304 of 2013, which was dismissed by a learned Judge, along with several other writ petitions, by a common order dated 18.11.2013, which is put to challenge in this writ appeal.
2. At the cost of verbosity, it is worth extracting paragraphs 2 to 4 of the order impugned in this writ appeal, which will give a bird's eye view of the issue involved in this case.
3. According to the petitioners, as per G.O.Ms.No.216, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 22.03.1993, they are entitled to Selection Grade and Special Grade pay of Primary School Headmasters. They heavily relied on the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court dated 14.07.2009 in W.P.No.8747 of 2009 confirming the order dated 07.10.1998 in O.A.No.8276 of 1997 of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal and also the order of the Apex Court dated 23.04.2010 in S.L.P.(CC)No.2746 of 2010 confirming the same. They also relied on various orders of this Court, which are all in terms of the aforesaid order of the Division Bench dated 14.07.2009 in W.P.No.8747 of 2009.
4. Therefore, in all these writ petitions, the issue that arises for consideration is as to whether G.O.Ms.No.216, Finance (PC) Department, dated 22.03.1993 grants the writ petitioners, who were Secondary Grade Teachers in the Government High Schools and Higher Secondary Schools, the Selection Grade and Special Grade pay of the Primary School Headmaster, on completion of 10 years and 20 years of service with effect from 01.06.1988.”
(emphasis supplied by us)
3. The sum and substance of the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the issue involved herein has been taken upto the Supreme Court on two occasions, wherein, the validity of G.O.Ms. No.216, supra, has been upheld and hence, the appellant is entitled to be extended the benefit of the said Government Order. Placing reliance on the orders of this court passed in WP. No. 8747 of 2009 on 14.07.2009 which was affirmed by the Supreme Court vide order dated 23.04.2010 in SLP (CC) No.2746 of 2010, and in W.P.No.9759 of 2012 on 17.04.2012, which was affirmed vide judgment dated 22.08.2012 in WA No. 1566 of 2012, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that similarly placed persons like the appellant herein, have been granted such relief and hence, the respondent authorities may be directed to consider the claim of the appellant, in the light of the aforesaid earlier orders of this court.
4. Mr.U.M.Ravichandran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents fairly admitted that the validity of G.O.Ms.No.216, supra, has been upheld even by the Supreme Court. But, according to him, what is to be decided is whether the appellant comes within the purview of the said Government Order so as to be extended the benefit of the same.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. The relief sought in the writ petition was only for a mandamus directing the respondent authorities to consider the claim of the appellant seeking special grade in the post of Primary School Headmaster, by extending the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.216 Scho
The court emphasized the importance of considering the appellant's claim purely on merits and in accordance with law, without being influenced by any previous observations.
The main legal point established is the inapplicability of G.O.Ms.No.216 to the petitioner due to delay and laches, and the determination that the petitioner, working in a private aided school, was o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to selection/special grade for government employees is based on stagnation in the same post without promotion for a certain pe....
The concept of granting selection grade and special grade should not be tampered with and that teachers are either eligible for promotion or for Selection/Special Grade, not both.
The court affirmed that benefits under government orders must be uniformly extended to all similarly situated individuals, regardless of their litigation status.
Stale and belated claims cannot be entertained, and benefits as directed by a Full Bench order shall be extended only to parties before the Court, with no fresh writ petitions entertained after a spe....
A Physical Education Teacher is not entitled to salary benefits under G.O.Ms.No.216, which applies only to specific teaching categories, and claims for arrears during service are unjustified due to t....
Teachers promoted as Primary School Headmasters after 01.06.1988 are entitled to receive monetary benefits based on their earlier service as Secondary Grade Teachers, as per the judgment in S.Chandra....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of teachers promoted as Primary School Headmasters after 01.06.1988 to the financial benefits of Selection Grade and Special Gra....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.