BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.S. SUNDAR, S. SRIMATHY, JJ.
Sasikumar - Appellant
Versus
The Authorised Officer/Chief Manager & Another - Respondent
W.P. (MD). No. 21125 of 2022 & W.M.P. (MD). Nos. 15333 & 15335 of 2022
Decided On : 02-09-2022
SARFAESI Act - Possession Notice - The court directed the respondent bank to defer the sale or any action pursuant to the possession notice, provided the petitioner pays the specified installments and allowed the petitioner to submit a representation for waiver of penal interest or restructuring the loan.
Fact of the Case:
The Writ Petition challenges the possession notice issued by the respondent bank regarding the outstanding amount. The petitioner offers to pay 25% of the amount due in installments.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the respondent bank to defer the sale or any action pursuant to the possession notice, provided the petitioner pays the specified installments and allowed the petitioner to submit a representation for waiver of penal interest or restructuring the loan.
Issues: Challenge to possession notice, petitioner's offer to pay in installments, and seeking waiver or restructuring of the loan.
Ratio Decidendi: The court can provide directions to the respondent bank regarding the deferment of sale or action pursuant to the possession notice, and the petitioner can submit a representation for waiver or restructuring of the loan.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of with directions to the respondent bank, and no costs are imposed. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned possession notice issued by the first respondent in his proceedings Nil dated 29.07.2022 and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.)
S.S. Sundar, J.
1. This Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned possession notice issued by the respondent bank, dated 29.07.2022.
2. Heard Mr.R.Chandrasekar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Pethu Rajesh, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Bank.
3. As against the total outstanding amount of Rs.13,17,251.28/- (Rupees Thirteen Lakhs Seventeen Thousand Two Hundred Fifty One and Twenty Eight Paise only) as on 20.05.2020, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is prepared to pay 25% of the amount due within a period of four months in equal monthly installments.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and by consent of both the parties, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition with the following directions:
(i) The respondent bank shall defer the sale or any action pursuant to the impugned possession notice, dated 29.07.2022, on condition that the petitioner pays a sum of Rs.85,000/- (Rupees Eighty Five Thousand only) on or before 30.09.2022; a further sum of Rs.85,000/- (Rupees Eighty Five Thousand only) on or before 31.10.2022; a further sum of Rs.85,000/- (Rupees Eighty Five Thousand only) on or before 30.11.2022 and a further sum of Rs.85,000/- (Rupees Eighty Five Thousand only) on or before 31.12.2022;
(ii) In case, the petitioner fails to pay any one of the installments, in the manner as directed above, it is open to the respondent bank to proceed further in accordance with law ignoring this order;
(iii) In case, the petitioner deposits the amount as directed above, the petitioner is permitted to submit a representation to the respondent Bank either for waiver of penal interest or for One Time Settlement or for restructuring the loan and other concessions, as may be permissible under the guidelines of the Reserve Bank of India or the norms applicable to the respondent Bank and the respondent Bank shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law; and
(iv) Till such order is passed on the representation of the petitioner and the same is communicated to the petitioner, the respondent Bank shall not initiate any coercive action against the petitioner or the properties of the petitioner.
5. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
AI
The court has the authority to provide directions to the respondent bank regarding the deferment of sale or action pursuant to the possession notice, and the petitioner can submit a representation fo....
The court ruled that a notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, issued post-interim order, cannot be deemed fraudulent.
A writ petition is not maintainable against a possession notice issued by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act, as an alternative remedy exists before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
A writ petition is not maintainable against proceedings or sale notices initiated under the SARFAESI Act, as the aggrieved party must exhaust alternative statutory remedies before the Debt Recovery T....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.