BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G. ILANGOVAN, J.
A. Maruthupandi - Appellant
Versus
The State through The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madurai & Another - Respondent
Crl.A(MD). No. 533 of 2022
Decided On : 13-09-2022
Bail - Criminal Appeal - Summary
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed a criminal appeal to set aside the order passed by the trial court, which dismissed his bail application. The appellant was the main accused in a case where the deceased, who was running an auto for hiring, was assaulted and later died. The appellant sought bail citing delay in considering his representation and the release of the co-accused on bail.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the circumstances of the case, including the nature of the incident and the absence of bad antecedents against the appellant. It found that the appellant had been in judicial custody for a period and decided to grant bail on the condition that the appellant stay away from the occurrence village and report before the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Trichy daily.
Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant should be granted bail despite being the main accused in the case, with the prosecution strongly objecting to the bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the nature of the incident, the absence of bad antecedents against the appellant, and the period of incarceration in deciding to grant bail.
Final Decision: The appellant was ordered to be released on bail on the conditions specified by the court.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 14-A(2) of scheduled caste/scheduled Tribes Act, 1989 as amended by Act 1 of 2016, to call for the records relating to the order in Cr.MP No.1745 of 202, dated 18/08/2002 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Judge for PRC Act Cases, Madurai and set aside the same and grant bail.)
1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the order passed by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Madurai, in Crl.M.P.No.1745 of 2022, dated 18/08/2022.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant is the wife of the deceased. The deceased is running an auto for hiring. On 03/11/2021, the deceased informed the de-facto complainant that along one Nandeeswaran and Nandu, they went to a shop. At about 5.30 pm, she was informed that her husband was assaulted by some persons near the wine shop. One of the above said accused was stated to be one Maruthu. They immediately rushed to the spot and found that her husband lying with stab injuries. He informed that he was assaulted by Maruthu and several persons. He was taken to the hospital, and on 04/11/2021, without responding to the treatment, he died. After completing the investigation, final report has been filed and it was taken cognizance in Special CC No.32 of 2022 by the Special Court.
3. Heard both sides. The de-facto complainant also present and on her behalf, a legal aid counsel was appointed and he made a strong objection to allow this criminal bail appeal.
4. This petitioner, who is arrayed as A1 has filed this appeal against the dismissal of the order, that was passed by the trial court. He was arrested and remanded to judicial custody, on 05/11/2021.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that Act 14 was invoked against the petitioner and later, that was quashed by this court in HCP(MD)No.311 of 2022; It is learnt that there was an ordinate delay in considering the representation of the detenue; that order was passed, on 19/07/2022; Later, he moved bail application before the Special Court for PCR cases, Madurai and that came to be dismissed, on 18/08/2022 on the ground that this petitioner is the main accused and if he is released on bail, there is every likelihood of tampering the witnesses. The earlier applications were also dismissed, on 18/08/2022, Crl.MP Nos.466, 1602, 1745 of 2022. Finding that there was no change of circumstances, the above said petitions were dismissed. According to the appellant, the co-accused has been released on bail.
6. Perusal of the CD file shows that out of petty quarrel between the deceased and the accused persons in a drunken mood, the above said murder said to have been committed and no bad antecedent is also reported against this petitioner.
7. Considering the incarceration period of the petitioner, this court is inclined to allow the criminal appeal by setting aside the order passed by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Madurai, in Crl.M.P.No.1745 of 2022, dated 18/08/2022 on condition that he must stay away from the occurrence village and shall stay at Trichy and report before the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Trichy daily at 10.30 am till the material witness are being examined by the trial court.
8. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge for PCR Act Cases, Madurai and on further condition that the petitioner shall stay at Trichy and report before the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Trichy till the material witnesses are being examined by the trial court.
The court may grant bail to the accused based on the nature of the incident, absence of bad antecedents, and period of incarceration.
The court considered the nature of the offence, period of incarceration, and the fact that some co-accused were already granted bail in deciding to grant bail to the appellant.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the circumstances and duration of custody.
The court considered the circumstances and absence of injuries in the case as key factors in allowing the criminal appeal and granting bail to the appellant.
The court has the discretion to grant bail, considering the circumstances of the case, including the period of judicial custody and completion of investigation.
The completion of investigation, the period of incarceration, and the lack of previous bad antecedents can be considered in granting bail, even in cases involving serious offenses.
The court considered the nature of the offence, the period of incarceration, and the fact that it was a case of counter in granting bail to the appellants.
The completion of investigation, period of incarceration, and the bail granted to co-accused are relevant factors in considering the grant of bail under the SC/ST Act and IPC.
Bail granted to accused lacking specific allegations in FIR, parity with co-accused, despite SC/ST atrocity charges.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the appellant's custody, previous cases, and specific allegations in determining eligibility for bail in a case involving the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.