SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 158

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
Sunder Bai – Appellant
Versus
P. Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M. Sunil Kumar.

ORDER :

PRAYER : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decree passed in MP No.2 of 2021 in RLTOP No.249 of 2020 dated 26.09.2022 on the file of the XII Small Causes Court, Chennai.

The present Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the learned XII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai in MP No.2 of 2021 in RLTOP No.249 of 2020 dated 26.09.2022.

2. The revision petitioner is the tenant and the respondents 1 and 2 are the landlord filed RLTOP No.249 of 2020 for eviction under Section 21(2)(a) of the New Act.

3. During the pendency of the proceedings, the respondents 1 and 2 filed miscellaneous petition in MP No.2 of 2021 to implead the revision petitioner as party in the RLTOP proceedings. The said miscellaneous petition was allowed and thus the petitioner is constrained to move the present Civil Revision Petition.

4. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner made a submission that the revision petitioner is a tenant, but not impleaded as party in the RLTOP at the initial stage. Thus the respondents 1 and 2 cannot implead the revision petitioner as party in the RLTOP proceedings, which is pen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top