SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 254

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
S. Prabhu – Appellant
Versus
C. Rangasamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S. Kanniah.
For the Respondents: Mr. K.T.S. Sivakumar.

ORDER :

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 01.12.2021 passed in I.A.No.2 of 2021 in O.S.No.76 of 2021 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sendamangalam and grant the injunction as prayed for.

The Civil Revision petition has been filed against the order dated 01.12.2021 passed in I.A.No.2 of 2021 on O.S.No.76 of 2021.

2. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff, who instituted a Suit for permanent injunction in O.S.No.76 of 2021. Along with the Suit the revision petitioner file I.A.No.2 of 2021 for grant of interim injunction, which was granted by the Trial Court at the time of admission of the Suit. The injunction was in force. While so, the Trial Court on 01.12.2021 closed the Interlocutory Application without assigning any reason and merely on the ground that the Suit was ripe for trial.

3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner mainly contended that the Interlocutory Application was not decided on merits. More so, the injunction was in force all along from the institution of the Suit and till such time the Suit was posted for trial. The Trial Court without recording any reason simply cl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top