SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 333

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
A. Manimaran – Appellant
Versus
Jesintha Priyadharshini – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S. Kingston Jerold.

ORDER :

[Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Learned Subordinate Judge at Bhavani to dispose the Suit in O.S.No.168 of 2020 within a time frame fixed by this Court.]

1. The relief sought for in the present civil revision petition is to direct the Subordinate Court, Bhavani to dispose of the Suit in O.S.No.168 of 2020.

2. The revision petitioner is the 1st defendant and the respondents 1 and 2 instituted a Suit for partition. The Suit was instituted in the year 2020 and the 1st defendant/revision petitioner herein made a submission that the other parties to the Suit are attempting to drag on the proceedings and therefore, the Trial Court is to be directed to dispose of the Suit as expeditiously as possible.

3. Unnecessary adjournments on flimsy grounds would cause prejudice to the parties to the litigation. Rule is to conduct the case on the date it is posted for hearing. Adjournment is an exception. Thus, adjournments are to be granted only on genuine grounds and even in such circumstances, on commencement of trial long adjournments are to be avoided. The reason is to be recorded by the Courts, if it is genuine.

4. Lo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top