Mary Rajaratnam vs G. Sangeetha - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 156

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Mad) 156

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
Mary Rajaratnam – Appellant
Versus
G. Sangeetha – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A. Saravanan.

ORDER :

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to give a direction to expeditious disposal in O.S.No.4376 of 2022 on the file of the Hon'ble V Assistant City Civil Court at Madras and grant such other relief may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.

The Civil Revision Petition has been instituted to direct the V Assistant City Civil Court, Madrasto dispose of the suit in O.S.No.4376 of 2022 within the stipulated time.

2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner mainly contended that the revision petitioner instituted a Suit in O.S.No.4376 of 2022 and further contended that she is a 101 year old woman. Therefore, speedy disposal of the suit is just and necessary.

3. Unnecessary adjournments on flimsy grounds would cause prejudice to the parties to the litigation. Rule is to conduct the case on the date it is posted for hearing. Adjournment is an exception. Thus adjournments are to be granted only on genuine grounds and even in such circumstances, on commencement of trial long adjournments are to be avoided. The reason is to be recorded by the Courts, if it is genuine.

4. Long pendency of litigations causing untol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document