Back
R. MAHADEVAN, J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
Peoples Watch, represented by its Executive Director Henri Tiphagne – Appellant
Versus
Home Secretary, Home Department (Prison), Secretariat, Chennai – Respondent
ORDER
(R. Mahadevan, J.)
The aforesaid words of the South African anti-apartheid activist resonate in the mind of this court, while we deal with the issue involved in this public interest litigation.
2.The petitioner, a Human Rights Organisation based at Madurai, represented by its Executive Director, has filed this writ petition seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to appoint trained and skilled non-official visitors to the Board of Visitors to Jails as per Rule 507 of the Tamil Nadu Prison Rules, 1983 for visiting each of the Central Jails and Sub Jails to address the grievance of prisoners and helping the prison administration and also to incorporate the directions issued by the Joint Secretary of Home Department to the Government of India vide proceedings in F.No.16014/4/2005-PR dated 18.02.2011 and Chapter 29 of the Model Prison Manual, 2003 within a time that may be stipulated by this Court.
3.(i) According to the petitioner, prisons in our State still remain closed institutions and
The judgment establishes that the systemic neglect of prisoners with disabilities constitutes human rights violations, emphasizing the need for comprehensive reforms in prison infrastructure and trea....
The right to free legal aid is a fundamental right under Article 21, ensuring that no prisoner is denied legal representation due to poverty or ignorance.
The court mandated the improvement of communication facilities for legal practitioners with undertrial prisoners, emphasizing adherence to the Tamil Nadu Prison Rules and the protection of prisoners'....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of prison personnel, particularly Senior Superintendent/Superintendent of Jail, should be in accordance with the established r....
Geographical restrictions on prisoner escort visits do not violate fundamental rights and are justified by practical considerations.
Public servants must be utilized exclusively for public duties, and any misuse for personal tasks by officials is impermissible.
The petitioners' confinement in a single cell does not amount to solitary confinement, but rather "seclusion". The petitioners' right to meet their relatives and advocates is not being violated. The ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
