Back
S. S. SUNDAR, N. MALA
Parvathiammal – Appellant
Versus
N. Adikesavan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.S. Sundar, J.
All these three Writ Appeals are connected with each other and they arise out of the common order passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 07.04.2011 in W.P.Nos.12613 and 24522 of 2001.
2. The appellants 1 to 6 in W.A.No.1314 of 2011 are the petitioners in W.P.No.24522 of 2001. The deceased second petitioner in W.P.No.24522 of 2001, who is the 2nd appellant, is shown as dead in the cause title even in the Writ Appeal in W.A.No.1314 of 2011. The legal heirs of 1st appellant were brought on record as appellants 7 to 10 during pendency of appeal.
3. The appellants in W.A.No.844 of 2011 are the petitioners 10 and 21 in W.P.No.12613 of 2001.
4. The appellant in W.A.No.845 of 2011 is the 1st petitioner in WP.No.12613/2001. He died during the pendency of the appeal and his legal representatives were impleaded as the appellants 2 to 4 by the order of this Court in C.M.P.No.16416 of 2022, dated 14.11.2022.
5. The appellants (respective writ petitioners) along with others, filed two Writ Petitions in WP.Nos.12613 and 24522/2001 challenging the order passed by the Commissioner of Land Administration, Chennai, dated 14.05.2001. The further prayer in WP.No.24522/20
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove that the subject lands are ryoti lands and have vested with the Government under the Ryotwari Act, 1948, in order to obtai....
The High Court cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact recorded by quasi-judicial authorities in the absence of any jurisdictional error or patent perversity.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction to adjudicate land classification disputes under the Estate Abolition Act despite administrative orders, emphasizing the necessity for factual determination on ryoti ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of upholding the integrity of legal processes, ensuring compliance with court orders, and preventing manipulation of legal procee....
Substantive rights granted under relevant agricultural legislation cannot be challenged through procedural claims, especially after attaining finality through multiple Authorities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
