SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3079

D. KRISHNAKUMAR, P. B. BALAJI
District Revenue Officer, Namakkal – Appellant
Versus
K. Kulanthaivel – Respondent


For the Appearing Parties :Silambanan, Additional Advocate General Assisted by Geetha Thamaraiselvan, Special Govt. Pleader, R. Nalliyappan, V.K. Vijayaraghavan, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

(Common Prayer: Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 03.12.2009 in W.P.No.68/2005.)

Common Judgment:

D. Krishnakumar, J.

1. The respondents 1 & 2 in W.P.No.68 of 2005 are the appellants in W.A.No.1816 of 2011. The 3rd respondent in W.P.No.68 of 2005 is the appellant in W.A.No.762 of 2011. They aggrieved by the allowing of the aforesaid writ petition, in and by which the order of the second appellant dated 20.12.2004 was set aside, restoring the order of the first appellant dated 27.05.1998 granting ryotwari patta in favour of the writ petitioner / first respondent in W.A.No.1816 of 2011, had filed these writ appeals.

2. Facts leading to the filing of these writ appeals are as under. For the sake of brevity, the array of parties in W.A.No.1816 of 2011 is adopted.

2.1. The first respondent / petitioner's mother, one Pavayee Ammal, purchased an extent of 7.33 acres of land out of a total extent of 8.87 acres of land in Singalanthapuram Village in Rasipuram Taluk under Sale Deed dated 11.06.1995. The lands in question wer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top